BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Citizens of Parktown

Expert replies
by GmatKiss » Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:15 am
Citizens of Parktown are worried by the increased freq of serious crimes commited by local teenagers. In response the city government has instituted a series of measures designed to keep teenagers at home in the late evening. Even if the measures succeeded in keeping teenagers at home, however, they are unlikely to affect the problem that concerns citizens, since more crimes committed by local teenagers take place between 3p.m. and 6p.m.
Which of the following, if true, most substanitially weakens the argument?


A) Similiar measures adopted in other places have failed to reduce the number of teenagers on the streets in the late evening.
B) The crimes committed by teenagers in the afternoon are mostly small thefts and inconsequential vandalism
C) Teenagers are much less likely to commit serious crimes when they are at home than when they are not at home
D) Any decrease in the need for police patrols in the late evening would not mean that there could be more intensive patrolling in the afternoon
E)The schools in Parktown have introduced a number of after-school programs that will be available to teenagers until 6 p.m. on weekday afternoons.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by thestartupguy » Sat Oct 29, 2011 12:48 pm
IMO: B
Join the discussion

by mankey » Sun Oct 30, 2011 3:07 am
IMO: E.

Could someone please provide OA for this problem?

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by advita » Tue Nov 01, 2011 2:10 am
isn't it C guys.!!!
IMO C.
Join the discussion

by gb » Tue Nov 01, 2011 7:34 am
The issue is 'serious crimes'. The solution proposed is to keep teens at home during late evenings. The author disagrees and talks about 'more crimes' committed b/w 3 - 6 pm. Now you need to weaken the argument.

Option B - says that during afternoon the crimes are small and inconsequential. So, they are not 'serious crimes'. Therefore, the 3 - 6 pm issues will not have an impact on 'serious crimes'.

So, the option is B
Join the discussion

by vaibhavgupta » Tue Nov 01, 2011 7:52 am
GmatKiss wrote:Citizens of Parktown are worried by the increased freq of serious crimes commited by local teenagers. In response the city government has instituted a series of measures designed to keep teenagers at home in the late evening. Even if the measures succeeded in keeping teenagers at home, however, they are unlikely to affect the problem that concerns citizens, since more crimes committed by local teenagers take place between 3p.m. and 6p.m.
Which of the following, if true, most substanitially weakens the argument?


A) Similiar measures adopted in other places have failed to reduce the number of teenagers on the streets in the late evening.
B) The crimes committed by teenagers in the afternoon are mostly small thefts and inconsequential vandalism
C) Teenagers are much less likely to commit serious crimes when they are at home than when they are not at home
D) Any decrease in the need for police patrols in the late evening would not mean that there could be more intensive patrolling in the afternoon
E)The schools in Parktown have introduced a number of after-school programs that will be available to teenagers until 6 p.m. on weekday afternoons.
+1 for B
If OA is A, IMO B
If OA is B, IMO C
If OA is C, IMO D
If OA is D, IMO E
If OA is E, IMO A

FML!! :/
Join the discussion

by mankey » Tue Nov 01, 2011 8:54 am
Why cant it be E? Since schools will keep teenagers busy during the day time and in the evening time, policies of the government will ensure.

Please explain.

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by karthikj » Wed Nov 02, 2011 12:00 pm
I am leaning towards E because B "kind of" strengthens the argument by talking about crimes may continue. We are provided no information about whether afternoon crimes can be considered serious or not.

E clearly states an alternate option for keeping teenagers away from crime.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Thu Nov 03, 2011 12:41 am
I too believe answer should be E
Ashish

If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button
Join the discussion

by gunjan1208 » Thu Nov 03, 2011 2:43 am
+1 for B

E is wrong for Variety of reasons

It says "Weekday", that leaves the weekend for crime mongers....They would do crime then.
Is until 6 PM end of evening....Can't the crime be commited after 6 PM -- Assumption which is wrong...


What is OA??
Join the discussion

by gmatblood » Fri Nov 04, 2011 12:34 pm
Even i went for E guys, OA is B
Join the discussion

by x2suresh » Fri Nov 04, 2011 1:26 pm
GmatKiss wrote:Citizens of Parktown are worried by the increased freq of serious crimes commited by local teenagers. In response the city government has instituted a series of measures designed to keep teenagers at home in the late evening. Even if the measures succeeded in keeping teenagers at home, however, they are unlikely to affect the problem that concerns citizens, since more crimes committed by local teenagers take place between 3p.m. and 6p.m.
Which of the following, if true, most substanitially weakens the argument?


A) Similiar measures adopted in other places have failed to reduce the number of teenagers on the streets in the late evening.
B) The crimes committed by teenagers in the afternoon are mostly small thefts and inconsequential vandalism
C) Teenagers are much less likely to commit serious crimes when they are at home than when they are not at home
D) Any decrease in the need for police patrols in the late evening would not mean that there could be more intensive patrolling in the afternoon
E)The schools in Parktown have introduced a number of after-school programs that will be available to teenagers until 6 p.m. on weekday afternoons.
What is the Conclusion?

keeping teenagers at home, Unlikely to affect the problem that concerns citizens (problem Serious Crimes).

Answer should weaken this conclusion:
Take B --> Most of the crimes and thrift or tiny crimes.. ( they are not serous crimes)
that means .. serious crimes will happen in the late evenings..

i.e means Likely to affect the problem (.. No serious crimes.. (weaken)


choice E:

after-school programs that will be available to teenagers until 6 p.m.

Nowhere mention that teenagers all or most of these teenagers will be joining this program.
Say for e.g. there are 100 teenagers
it is poosible that may be 50 teenagers not in programm are commiting serious crimes
it is poosible that may be 70 teenagers not in programm are commiting serious crimes
it is poosible that may be 5 teenagers not in programm are commiting serious crimes

So It may Strenthen the argument .. its not clear.


Choice B is better than E
Join the discussion