BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Church law

Expert replies
by arora007 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:17 am
Having been forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for a priest during the Middle Ages to sire a family.


a) Having been forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for a priest during the Middle Ages to sire a family.

b) Forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for a priest during the Middle-Ages to sire a family.

c) Although they were forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for a priest during the Middle Ages to sire a family.

d) Although a priest was forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for him during the Middle Ages to sire a family.

e) Although they were forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for priests during the Middle Ages to sire families.


source: Cambridge test

[spoiler]OA is E, i got it wrong B, but E is the right answer showing the contrast with 'although' [/spoiler]
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by paes » Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:28 am
Initially I also selected B.

But actually B has a modifier issue.

Forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for a priest during the Middle-Ages to sire a family.

only E has no issue.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:30 am
paes wrote:Initially I also selected B.

But actually B has a modifier issue.

Forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for a priest during the Middle-Ages to sire a family.

only E has no issue.
what's the problem with D?
Join the discussion

by arora007 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:37 am
paes wrote:Initially I also selected B.

But actually B has a modifier issue.

Forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for a priest during the Middle-Ages to sire a family.

only E has no issue.
I think there is no problem with "it" , otherwise even E would have a problematic...rite??

The problem is with no contrast being present in B, the same is mentioned in the answer explanation.
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Join the discussion

by arora007 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:42 am
gmatmachoman wrote:
paes wrote:Initially I also selected B.

But actually B has a modifier issue.

Forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for a priest during the Middle-Ages to sire a family.

only E has no issue.
what's the problem with D?
The explanation says..."the fourth choice changes the intended meaning of the original by implying that there was a single priest who sired several families."
I could not understand how the sentence intends that... I would perhaps like some expert to shed light on this!
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Join the discussion

by madhukumar_v » Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:44 am
A,B: Modifier Problem (Who was forbidden)
C: Pronoun problem (they..priest - should be priests)
E: What was unusual for priests - to sire families (was corresponds to families, plural)

So D, Also in D subject starts early (Although a priest..than postponing to the later part of the sentence)
Join the discussion

by prosaicblabber » Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:46 am
rewrite this sentence as

It was not unusual for a priest during the Middle-Ages to sire a family,forbidden by Church law to marry.

now Forbidden by Church law to marry doesn't clearly refers to priest . so seems erroneous to me. my 2 cents.
i never have a "TO -DO" list and i end up having a lot of "NOW WAT TO DO ?" lists
Join the discussion

by paes » Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:42 pm
arora007 wrote:
paes wrote:Initially I also selected B.

But actually B has a modifier issue.

Forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for a priest during the Middle-Ages to sire a family.

only E has no issue.
I think there is no problem with "it" , otherwise even E would have a problematic...rite??

The problem is with no contrast being present in B, the same is mentioned in the answer explanation.
E does not have a modifier issue.

Some concept here :
Actually there are two ways to remove an opening modifier issue (as in B)

1. Instead of modifier, create a clause. [ E is doing that, here they can refer to priests only ]
2. put the right thing just after the modifier. we can write B as
e.g. Forbidden by Church law to marry, priests ......
Join the discussion

by paes » Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:43 pm
arora007 wrote:
gmatmachoman wrote:
paes wrote:Initially I also selected B.

But actually B has a modifier issue.

Forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for a priest during the Middle-Ages to sire a family.

only E has no issue.
what's the problem with D?
The explanation says..."the fourth choice changes the intended meaning of the original by implying that there was a single priest who sired several families."
I could not understand how the sentence intends that... I would perhaps like some expert to shed light on this!
D is clearly wrong, with the same reason whatever you have written.
Read it again and you will come to know.
Join the discussion

by fitzgerald23 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:52 pm
You can quickly eliminate A & B, because it is ambiguous as to who has been forbidden. Was "it" forbidden or was it the priest?

C can be eliminated because the two dont agree in number. "they were forbidden".... "a priest"

D is eliminated because the meaning changes. "a priest was forbidden" means that the sentence is simply about one specific priest, which is not the intended meaning.

That leaves E. This clears the number issue as it uses "they" and "priests". The use of although is proper here as well.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1