BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Choi & Hart

Expert replies
by rd169 » Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:47 am
Choi: All other factors being equal, children whose parents doctorates are more like to earn a doctorate than children whose parents did not earn doctorates.

Hart: But consider this: Over 70 percent of all doctorates holders do not have a parent that holds a doctorate.

Which of the following is the most accurate evaluation of Hart's reply?

(A) It establishes that Choi's claim is an exaggeration.
(B) If true, it effectively demonstrates that Choi's claim cannot be accurate.
(C) It is consistent with Choi's claim.
(D) It provides alternative reasons for accepting Choi's claim.
(E) It mistakes what is necessary for an event with what is sufficient to determine that the event will occur.

Source: Kap 800
Please justify your choice.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

IMO E

by enniguy » Wed Sep 02, 2009 5:26 pm
IMO
B is a trap and E is the answer.
I am not at all sure though. Please post the OA.

E - 70% figure is not sufficient to disprove Choi's claim although such a probability will be necessary to prove Choi's claim.
Join the discussion

by rd169 » Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:52 pm
OA is surprisinglyC
Join the discussion

by enniguy » Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:58 pm
rd169 wrote:OA is surprisinglyC
I checked the book. C is indeed the answer. The explanation in the book is sufficient enough to support the answer but I dont a***e with the assumptions made. The book's explanation goes something like this:
The 70% doctorates can themselves have a good probability of having children who are doctorates. Hence, Hart's argument doesn't actually contradict with Choi's. To easily understand you can presume something like, Hart is talking about your parent's generation and Choi about your generation.

I don't agree with the assumption in the explanation though.
Join the discussion

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 9:24 pm
I'm going with E. No confidence on my answer. Can anyone tell OA?
Join the discussion