BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Cheaper than coal or oi

Expert replies
by Anial » Fri Apr 09, 2010 8:20 pm
Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintaining nuclear reactors are too high for nuclear power to likely prove cheaper than coal or oil in the long run.
(A) too high for nuclear power to likely
(B) high enough for nuclear power to be unlikely to
(C) high enough that it is unlikely nuclear power will
(D) so high that nuclear power is unlikely to
(E) so high as to be unlikely that nuclear power will

1000 sc Oa A is D.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by reply2spg » Fri Apr 09, 2010 8:45 pm
It must be D, Is 1000 SC says A?
Anial wrote:Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintaining nuclear reactors are too high for nuclear power to likely prove cheaper than coal or oil in the long run.
(A) too high for nuclear power to likely
(B) high enough for nuclear power to be unlikely to
(C) high enough that it is unlikely nuclear power will
(D) so high that nuclear power is unlikely to
(E) so high as to be unlikely that nuclear power will

1000 sc Oa A is D.
Join the discussion

by gauravgundal » Fri Apr 09, 2010 10:05 pm
If OA is A,then it is wrong .
Because word 'likely' cannot be used between to and verb prove.
Join the discussion

by akhpad » Sat Apr 10, 2010 8:01 am
I am unable to select between B and D.
Last edited by akhpad on Sat Apr 10, 2010 9:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Sat Apr 10, 2010 9:16 am
Anial wrote:Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintaining nuclear reactors are too high for nuclear power to likely prove cheaper than coal or oil in the long run.
(A) too high for nuclear power to likely - Split infinitive Error
(B) high enough for nuclear power to be unlikely to - 'to be unlikely to' awkward
(C) high enough that it is unlikely nuclear power will - unlikely nuclear, I think it needs a THAT in b/w
(D) so high that nuclear power is unlikely to - concise and correct
(E) so high as to be unlikely that nuclear power will - 'so high as to be' - awkward
IMO : D
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion

by mj41 » Mon Apr 12, 2010 3:05 am
I think there is something wrong with this sentence; how can you compare nuclear power to coal and oil
Join the discussion

by subgeeth » Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:06 am
I am confused between D and E can any one explain what is wrong in E and what makes D even more precise

I thought the usage of will which implies future is correct here
Still working on my dreams best part is I have not achieved one yet !!!!!
Join the discussion

by grockit_andrea » Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:20 am
E says that the "costs... are so high as to be unlikely...", which makes it sound like the costs are unlikely. But that's incorrect; what's unlikely is that nuclear power will be cheaper than coal or oil. D is concise and clear, making sure that each adjective is correctly placed; costs are "so high," and nuclear power is "unlikely to prove cheaper." E's construction is confusing and overly wordy.
Andrea A.
Grockit Tutor
https://www.grockit.com
Join the discussion

by subgeeth » Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:38 am
Thanks I understood now
Still working on my dreams best part is I have not achieved one yet !!!!!
Join the discussion

by Haaress » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:02 am
Andrea , I seem to shy away from the idiom "so as ...to" not only because GMAT seems to have flip flopped on its correctness but also because the MGMAT SC has coded as a "SUSPECT".

Would it be a good strategy to disqualify a sentence just based on the usage of the above idiom.

Thanks in advance.
Join the discussion

by grockit_andrea » Tue Jun 29, 2010 6:56 am
Haaress wrote:Andrea , I seem to shy away from the idiom "so as ...to" not only because GMAT seems to have flip flopped on its correctness but also because the MGMAT SC has coded as a "SUSPECT".

Would it be a good strategy to disqualify a sentence just based on the usage of the above idiom.

Thanks in advance.
I don't like to recommend using bright-line rules to eliminate answer choices; I think the best strategy is to approach things on a case-by-case basis, because many phrases are awkward or incorrect in one context but correct in another. "So high as to be" is awkward in choice E here, but to me that has more to do with the "be" than with the rest of the phrase.
Andrea A.
Grockit Tutor
https://www.grockit.com
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1