BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Challenging CR

Expert replies
by chaitanya.mehrotra » Sat Jun 25, 2011 5:18 am
Advertising Executive: More than 10 million American households now own digital video recorders which can fast-forward over television commercials; approximately 75% of these households fast-forward over at least one commercial per 30-minute program. Television commercials are now much less cost-effective as they are not as widely watched as they used to be.

Which of the following, if true, strengthens the claim made by the advertising executive?

(A) Product placement within television programs is a viable alternative to traditional television commercials
(B) The television programs preferred by consumers without digital video recorders are similar to those preferred by consumers with the devices
(C) In the past, television viewers did not switch channels, leave the room, or otherwise avoid watching some commercials
(D) The cost-effectiveness of television advertising is based less upon how many people watch a particular commercial and more upon the appropriateness of the demographic.
(E) Due to an imperfect sampling system used to measure the number of viewers, many companies find it difficult to determine the return on investment for television commercials

Doubt: I could solve this question only by POE and it took around 2.5 min to solve this ?
Is there a better logical way of solving this under 2 min ?

OA C
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by vikram4689 » Sat Jun 25, 2011 6:03 am
Now thats a ques. ;)
Took 1:49 sec and that too after double checking because your questions were going overrr my head :)

OK, Now lets get back to ques.
(A) Product placement within television programs is a viable alternative to traditional television commercials - DOES NOT STRENTHEN, there can be other reasons
(B) The television programs preferred by consumers without digital video recorders are similar to those preferred by consumers with the devices - does not have any effect
(C) In the past, television viewers did not switch channels, leave the room, or otherwise avoid watching some commercials - means earlier people used to watch adv. and thus strenthening the conclusion.
(D) The cost-effectiveness of television advertising is based less upon how many people watch a particular commercial and more upon the appropriateness of the demographic. - WEAKENS, as it says cost effectiveness is not related to what argument suggests
(E) Due to an imperfect sampling system used to measure the number of viewers, many companies find it difficult to determine the return on investment for television commercials - irrelevant
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Join the discussion

by najeeb775 » Sat Jun 25, 2011 6:16 am
Doesn't 'C' contradict the main statement itself which says "Television commercials are now much less cost-effective as they are not as widely watched as they used to be. ". It says Television commercials used to be widely watched earlier but option 'c' says earlier, people would avoid television commercials, how can this be true? I feel 'B' is better, it says now that people are fast forwarding the commercials and you can't even post the commercials to other types of programs as both type of people (with and without recorder) watch similar kind of commercials?
Join the discussion

by Tani » Sat Jun 25, 2011 8:25 am
"Television commercials are now much less cost-effective as they are not as widely watched as they used to be. " is the author's conclusion, not the "main statement". It is what you need to strengthen.

(C) says people did not avoid commercials in the past.

Try the denial test. If you deny C, you get:

(C) In the past, television viewers did switch channels, leave the room, or otherwise avoid watching some commercials .

This tells us that they've ignored commercials all along. Fastforwarding is just another way to do what they have always done. That means the ads may not be any less effective than before.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion