BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Celebrity Issues

Expert replies
by apoorva.rattan » Mon Jan 14, 2013 7:50 pm
It is clear that celebrities, despite their wealth, are more troubled, on average than are people who are not famous. This is evidenced by the high concentration of movie and television stars seen regularly on Wilshire Boulevard in Beverly Hills, an exclusive city in Los Angeles County. There, they are often spotted walking into and out of the facilities of many well known psychiatrists and plastic surgeons.

Which of the following would LEAST weaken the author's claims ?

(A) Many "B-movie" actors cannot afford to hire plastic surgeons.
(B) Ordinary citizens often forgo mental health treatment and cosmetic surgery for financial reasons.
(C) Troubled people are no more likely to pursue plastic surgery than are their emotionally stable counterparts.
(D) People of modest financial means are much less likely to be seen walking exclusive areas.
(E) Patients of psychiatrists differ from those not seeking such treatment primarily in terms of awareness of their own emotional vulnerabilities.

OA is A.

My take:
Conclusion presented: Wealthy celebrities are more troubled than average people.
A -> Not really related to the conclusion
B -> Ordinary citizens are equally troubled as celebrities but forgo treatment for financial reasons.
C -> Not related to the conclusion.
D -> Has nothing to do with conclusion. Since it does not talk about people's troubled health concerns.
E -> No relation of emotional vulnerabilities to money. So impact to conclusion.
Based on this, I think B should be the answer.

Would like to hear other people's thoughts and comments. Expert comments with explanations would be helpful.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by shenoydevika » Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:52 am
Hi Apoorva!

Are you sure you got the question right? I have gone over it twice and nothing jumps out at me. I see no answer choice that strengthens the arguments. Which of the following LEAST weakens the argument would mean that we have to choose the answer choice that strengthens the argument. (I think!)

If I had to choose,I would choose E. People who know they are troubled go psychiatrists and lots of celebrities go to psychiatrists because they are troubled (and know it!)
Join the discussion

by charu_mahajan » Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:52 am
Which of the following LEAST weakens the argument would mean that we have to choose the answer choice that strengthens the argument. (I think!)
@ shenoydevika,

LEAST weaken not just means Strengthens. It could also be a choice that does not affect the argument at all.
In 'Which of the following LEAST WEAKENS' - 4 choices will weaken the conclusion in one way or other (either strongly oppose or mildly weaken) and 1 choice might either strengthen or might not affect the conclusion at all. The choice that I usually tag with 'So What/ Who Cares/ I'm not Interested'.

Experts - Correct me if I'm wrong.
Join the discussion

by shenoydevika » Fri Jan 25, 2013 11:27 pm
LEAST weaken not just means Strengthens. It could also be a choice that does not affect the argument at all.
Ah! Ok. That does make sense. I don't know why I didn't think of it that way.

The answer choice [spoiler][A][/spoiler] makes so much sense now.
Thanks. charu
Join the discussion

by brianlange77 » Sat Jan 26, 2013 7:42 am
shenoydevika wrote:
LEAST weaken not just means Strengthens. It could also be a choice that does not affect the argument at all.
Ah! Ok. That does make sense. I don't know why I didn't think of it that way.

The answer choice [spoiler][A][/spoiler] makes so much sense now.
Thanks. charu
This is a great point -- when thinking of strengthening and weakening, we must resist the temptation to consider this a bipolar landscape. There will be those data points that strengthen, those that weaken, and those that sit in what I like to call the "Neutral Zone" -- neither good/nor bad.. they are just there.

I've always found it helpful when categorizing strengthen/weaken (especially on examples such as this one where it asks for 'least weakens' to simply read through the answer choices and assign one of the following variables -- W, w, N/a, s, S -- (Really Weakens, somewhat weakens, no effect, somewhat strengthens, Really Strengthens.) Do that and then go back and think about -- "Okay, based on what question told me, what am I really looking for here?"

Hope this helps.

-Brian
_________________
Brian Lange
Instructor, Manhattan GMAT
Expert Contributor to Beat The GMAT

Merci, Danke, Grazie, Gracias -- Whichever way you say it, if you found my post helpful, please click on the 'thank' icon in the top right corner of this post.

And I encourage you to click on 'follow' to track all my posts -- all the cool kids are doing it! :-)
Join the discussion

by nisagl750 » Sat Jan 26, 2013 9:35 pm
Though I did get the answer of this question correct, but I still doubt that I understood the question stem perfectly.
Can anyone please explain the detailed analysis of each of the five choice statements and what are their effect on the conclusion?
How each statement either strongly weaken, least weaken, strengthen or most strengthen the conclusion stated in the question.

What I understood is:
Conclusion: More popular celebrities (obviously the wealthy ones) suffer more because they are seen visiting psychiatrists and plastic surgeons more often.
Do just visiting docs make these celebrities more troubled?

I didn't understand how the conclusion will be weakened.
Does the statement which suggest that wealthy celebrities are less troubled weakens the conclusion?
Or the statement which suggest that wealthy celebrities are indeed more troubled weakens the conclusion?

I know my doubt is a silly one, but I really didn't get this question.

Please help!
Join the discussion