BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Cause & Effect Problem

Expert replies
by buzzdeepak » Fri Jan 04, 2013 5:54 am
People with high blood pressure are generally more nervous and anxious than people who do not have high blood pressure. This fact shows that this particular combination of personality traits - the so-called hypertensive personality - is likely to cause a person with these traits to develop high blood pressure.

The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument
A. fails to define the term "hypertensive personality"
B. presupposes that people have permanent personality traits
C. simply restates the claim that there is a "hypertensive personality" without providing evidence to support that claim
D. takes a correlation between personality traits and high blood pressure as proof that the traits cause high blood pressure
E. focuses on nervousness and anxiety only, ignoring other personality traits that people with high blood pressure might have

Answer: D

[spoiler] I could eliminate A, B, C but was stuck between D and E.
I felt D is valid but not as convincing / strong as E. There could be other traits that lead to high BP, not just these 2. [/spoiler]

Looking for an explanation. Please help.
Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by charu_mahajan » Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:10 pm
Hi,

In these type of questions, please look at the structure ->

People with high BP - > More nervous and anxious (This is a finding)
Person who is nervous or anxious -> will develop high BP

Can you see the 'causation' here. The author takes a finding/observation , reverses it to conclude something else.

About your choice E - People with high BP may develop n number of other traits or diseases. Assume High BP not only causes nervousness or anxiety, but also diabetes, cardiac arrest (just assume) etc. How does it matter? How does it affect the argument?

If we look at D, the author takes a correlation (Just because something happened) as a proof (that something will definitely happen).

I hope this helps.
Join the discussion

by buzzdeepak » Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:22 pm
It did....thanks
Join the discussion