BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Carpet Problem!!! Weaken

Expert replies
by amysky_0205 » Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:03 am
Advertisement: Ten years ago, the Cormond Hotel's lobby was carpeted with Duratex carpet while the lobby of a nearby hotel was being carpeted with our competitor's most durable carpet. Today, after a decade in which the two hotels have had similar amounts of foot traffic through their lobbies, that other hotel is having to replace the worn-out carpeting near its lobby entrances, whereas the Cormond's Duratex carpeting has years of wear left in it.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the force of the advertisement's evidence for concluding that Duratex carpet is more durable than the carpet of its competitor?

(A) The lobby of the Cormond Hotel has five different entrances, but the lobby of the other hotel has only two.
(B) The carpet of the Cormond Hotel's lobby is not the most durable carpet that Duratex manufactures.
(C) The other hotel has a popular restaurant that can be reached from outside without walking through the hotel lobby.
(D) The carpet that is being used to replace carpeting near the other hotel's lobby entrances is not Duratex carpet.
(E) There is a third hotel near the other two that has not replaced the Duratex carpet in its lobby for more than 15 years.

OA: A

can someone explain this in detail!!! thank u so much!

I crossed out B, C and E.
plz especially explain [spoiler]D![/spoiler] tks (:
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by The Iceman » Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:59 am
As per option A, the same traffic is spread across 5 entrances for Cormond Hotel and across 2 entrances for the other hotel.

Clearly in latter's case the traffic per entrance is higher and hence the carpet reaches its end of life quicker even though its quality (in terms of durability) may not be inferior to that of the Duratex carpet.

So, A is correct.

B is irrelevant.

C in also not relevant because the argument clearly provides evidence that the foot traffic is same for both lobbies.

D is again irrelevant. How does it matter whether the new carpet is of the x,y,z .. brand? May be that the hotel has lower budget to purchase carpet and the Duratex carpet is highly priced. Note that being highly priced does not necessarily mean that a carpet better in durability. It is also possible that the third carpet is of much better quality than the other two, but how does even that impact the conclusion?

E is incorrect because first, we do not know the foot traffic in the over 15 years of its usage. May be the traffic is actually less. Second, even if the traffic is high, we do not know how many entrances are there in the third hotel.
Join the discussion

by manhhiep2509 » Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:19 am
I also see the question in another source and OA is C, different from that of the first poster.

A says the two hotel have different entrances, but so what?
Eventually, the amounts of foot traffic are similar.

C says people can go to the restaurant without going through the lobby. In other words, the amount of foot traffic is not counted in the advertisement.

Anyway, still need someone to confirm the OA.
Join the discussion

by David@VeritasPrep » Thu Jan 30, 2014 3:11 pm
The OA is A.

The number of entrances does matter. Foot traffic in the lobby might be thought to be randomly distributed, yet if there are only two entrances the traffic will be very concentrated and will follow a few patterns - from the entrances to the counter, from the entrances to the elevators, etc.

Now if there are 5 entrances there are many more traffic patterns and the same amount of traffic is distributed much more widely. If you can imagine people walking over a grassy field you can see how fewer paths mean that the paths are worn deeper. In terms of carpet this translates into worn our places.

Now as to choice C, this goes in the wrong direction, yes? The restaurant that you can reach from outside (not through the lobby) is at the OTHER hotel. The hotel that has had the carpet replaced. So that is the one with the worn out carpet. And furthermore this traffic is already taken care of... as The Iceman said in the prior posting, choice C is not really relevant since the argument clearly says that both lobbies have the same amount of traffic -- restaurant or not.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by Abhishek009 » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:31 am
amysky_0205 wrote:Advertisement: Ten years ago, the Cormond Hotel's lobby was carpeted with Duratex carpet while the lobby of a nearby hotel was being carpeted with our competitor's most durable carpet. Today, after a decade in which the two hotels have had similar amounts of foot traffic through their lobbies, that other hotel is having to replace the worn-out carpeting near its lobby entrances, whereas the Cormond's Duratex carpeting has years of wear left in it.
1. 10 yrs ago ------ C hotel's floor covered with D carpet VS Other hotel covered with comp most durable carpet.

2. Today ------- Other hotel have to replace their carpet ( Though foot traffic is same) whereas C Hotel's Carpet can sustain a few more years.

3. Leads us to conclude that --- Probably Carpet of the other hotel was of Inferior Quality.


Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the force of the advertisement's evidence for concluding that Duratex carpet is more durable than the carpet of its competitor?


(A) The lobby of the Cormond Hotel has five different entrances, but the lobby of the other hotel has only two.

Hotel C has many entrance , so there were more entrance points leading to distribution of Traffic equally among the five different entrance points . - Satisfactory.


(B) The carpet of the Cormond Hotel's lobby is not the most durable carpet that Duratex manufactures.

Not relevant .

(C) The other hotel has a popular restaurant that can be reached from outside without walking through the hotel lobby.

Out of scope ...

(D) The carpet that is being used to replace carpeting near the other hotel's lobby entrances is not Duratex carpet.

Might be true , we don't have sufficient information about the Carpet of the other Hotel.

(E) There is a third hotel near the other two that has not replaced the Duratex carpet in its lobby for more than 15 years.

Out of scope.



IMO (A) is the best !!
Abhishek
Join the discussion