BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

caribou

Expert replies
by svishal1123 » Sat May 09, 2009 5:05 pm
I came across this question in 1000SC.

A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the caribou into northern Minnesota would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than one wolf for every 39 square miles.

(A) would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than

(B) would fail provided the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more than

(C) should fail if the timber wolf density in that region was greater than

(D) will fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is greater than

(E) will fail if the timber wolf density in that region were more numerous than

OA D

I had 2 doubts:

1. "More than" should be used when comparing countable nouns. Density is countable, then why "More Than". I had read somewhere, that to compare 2 nouns which are expressed using numbers, greater than is used. Applying the same rule, are the below sentences correct?
--Japanese Cars have greater mileage than American Cars.
--I have greater money than my brother.
--Germany's GDP is greater than what it was 2 years ago.
--Germany's GDP increase is greater than world GDP increase.

Second is obviously wrong. I am not sure about the fourth. I cannot differentiate.

2. Second doubt - why "WILL". "WOULD" can be used to express a unreal situation that might arise in the future.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by cramya » Sat May 09, 2009 6:18 pm
Its a real or future conditional so use will (for a defnite situation).

If (condition), (implied or explicittly stated then) result

if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is greater than one wolf for every 39 square miles then reintroduction of the caribou into northern Minnesota will fail

Use would for unreal conditional situtations i.e. where the time to meet a certain condition has passed or the conditions were not met therefore the results did not or cannot happen


Also density is not countable even though it can be measured. We cant say 1 density,2 density like we cant say 1 money, 2 money

I think I have read in one of the answer explanations in OG that "would" is a future tense verb of something that happenned in the past and "will" is the future tense verb for something thats going to happen in the future. I may not be stating this as is so let me try to find the question if possible.


Regards,
CR
Join the discussion

by svishal1123 » Sat May 09, 2009 10:03 pm
Thanks Cramya.
I understand your explanation for will/would.

Regarding more/greater than, as per your explanation, density and money should be treated equally. As per this logic, "I have greater money than my brother" would stand correct. Without applying any rules, we know that it is wrong.
I have no clue where my is understanding wrong !!
Join the discussion

by cramya » Sat May 09, 2009 10:09 pm
Regarding more/greater than, as per your explanation, density and money should be treated equally. As per this logic, "I have greater money than my brother" would stand correct. Without applying any rules, we know that it is wrong.
I have no clue where my is understanding wrong !!
I think u may have be confusing "many"->used for only countable qts with "more". Correct me if its not so.

Both of these are correct IMO:
More women(countable)
More pollution(non countable)

Once we use the will/would rule we would be down to D and E.

Again we can use "numerous" with countable qts but here "density" is not countable so we use "greater than"
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1