BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Capital Improvements -Really Toughest

Expert replies
by snehit » Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:20 pm
To improve the town's overcrowded school system, the town council has proposed an ambitious education plan to reduce classroom size and make capital improvements - a plan they intend to pay for with an increase in property taxes for homes valued over $ 500,000. Although the school system desperately needs improving, the town council's plan should be defeated because the majority of the people who would end up paying for the improvements receive no benefit from them.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

A) The town's school system is currently ranked among the worst in the state

B) Other towns nearby that have made similar capital improvements did not find that the improvements translated to a better quality of education.

C) The town will need to spend additional money on architect's plan for the capital improvements.

D) An examination of the tax rolls shows that most home owners in this catagory no longer have school-age children.

E) Some homeowners will delay home improvement projects in order to keep the value of their homes below $500,000.

--> Which of the following, if true, provides the town council with the stongest counter to the objection that its plan is unfair?

a) Even with the proposed increase, property taxes in the town are well below the national average.

b) Paying for the school system improvements using existing town funds will result in shortfalls that will force the town into arrears.

c) The teachers in the town's school system receive some of the lowest salary packages in immediate area, which is a major cause of attrition.

d)) Smaller class sizes and capital improvements in a school system tend to increase property values in the surrounding community.

E) A feasibility study has shown that the cost of the improvements will likely be 20% higher than projected.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by rocketsbball » Thu Jun 04, 2009 12:33 am
Initially I thought that B was the answer, but nowhere does it say that the capital investments intended for better education unless you consider "improvements"; so IMO D; since it directly supports the conclusion by stating that the 500k income families will not have any benefit to the taxes (the argument)........

For the second question, IMO D since the arguments says there will be no benefit to the taxed households; clearly a rise in property values is a tradeoff that could be countered to the author's original argument.....

OA please....
Join the discussion

snehit wrote:To improve the town's overcrowded school system, the town council has proposed an ambitious education plan to reduce classroom size and make capital improvements - a plan they intend to pay for with an increase in property taxes for homes valued over $ 500,000. Although the school system desperately needs improving, the town council's plan should be defeated because the majority of the people who would end up paying for the improvements receive no benefit from them.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

A) The town's school system is currently ranked among the worst in the state

B) Other towns nearby that have made similar capital improvements did not find that the improvements translated to a better quality of education.

C) The town will need to spend additional money on architect's plan for the capital improvements.

D) An examination of the tax rolls shows that most home owners in this catagory no longer have school-age children.

E) Some homeowners will delay home improvement projects in order to keep the value of their homes below $500,000.

--> Which of the following, if true, provides the town council with the stongest counter to the objection that its plan is unfair?

a) Even with the proposed increase, property taxes in the town are well below the national average.

b) Paying for the school system improvements using existing town funds will result in shortfalls that will force the town into arrears.

c) The teachers in the town's school system receive some of the lowest salary packages in immediate area, which is a major cause of attrition.

d)) Smaller class sizes and capital improvements in a school system tend to increase property values in the surrounding community.

E) A feasibility study has shown that the cost of the improvements will likely be 20% higher than projected.
For Q-1
IMO is D since passage concludes that Homeowners do not benefit from the taxes. Option D supports the same.

For Q-2
IMO D
I chose this on the basis that it negates the conclusion that homeowners did not receive any benefit due to the tax increase. I was also considering option A but I think D negates the effect while A is more like an excuse by the state.

Please let us know the OA .
Join the discussion

by vinaynp » Thu Jun 04, 2009 7:50 am
1st Question :- D)
2nd Question:- D)

The explanations above are good.
Join the discussion

by snehit » Mon Jun 08, 2009 7:38 pm
OA is

D for both question
Join the discussion

by turbo jet » Wed Jun 10, 2009 7:16 am
Qs 1. D is correct. D & E were close choices. So, used assumption negation technique to choose D . (negating assumption and seeing whether it undermines the conclusion)
Qs 2: Was stuck between A and D. Both seem probable. Will go with amazonviper's logic. However in D we are assuming that increased property prices are benefiting the property tax payers.

Any views why D and not A are welcome.

Good qs !!!

Thnx
Turbo Jet


:) :)
Life is Tom; I am Jerry ;)
Join the discussion

Me thinks

by Bhattu » Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:09 am
q1 - D
q2 - A
Join the discussion

by schumi_gmat » Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:39 pm
D for both questions.

The tricky part in the 2nd question is the question stem.
Double negative making it positive
Join the discussion

by mason77 » Sun May 15, 2016 2:43 pm
For the first one D, but i'm confuced about second one
Join the discussion