BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Can we generalize this approach to consider C is right

Expert replies
by utkalnayak » Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:21 pm
There are quite a few questions I came across, where using option 1, the answer would come up with x = 2 or x = -2 hence insufficient. Using option 2, x = 2 or x = 5 hence insufficient. But the answer is explained as - if we add option 1 and 2 we see that the common value of x between the two is x = 2, hence option C is the right answer. Is this right approach ? I do not understand if the equations were simplified to come to 2 possible values of x, how can we simply ignore those just because we are considering both equations true.

Example -
What is the greatest common divisor of positive integers j and k ?

1) The greatest common divisor of 3j and 2k is 2
2) The greatest common divisor of 5j and k is 10
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by [email protected] » Thu Jan 22, 2015 4:31 pm
Hi utkalnayak,

When dealing with an individual Fact in a DS question, if you determine that the answer to the given question changes, then that Fact is INSUFFICIENT.

When both Facts are individually insufficient, then you must combine the Facts and use them BOTH to try to answer the question. In your initial example, you provide the following:

Fact 1: X = 2 or X = -2
Fact 2: X = 2 or X = 5

At this point, you look for "overlap" - what answer (or answers) fit BOTH Facts? In this example, there is JUST ONE (X = 2). In this way, the Facts TOGETHER are SUFFICIENT to answer the question (so the final answer is C).

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by utkalnayak » Thu Jan 22, 2015 9:41 pm
Thank you Rich for the clarification. That info is going to be very useful to me
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Sun Jan 25, 2015 8:37 pm
Utkal, the key idea here is that both statements are true, so when we combine them, anything on which they disagree must be false. For instance, if S1 says x = 2 or x = -2, we know that one of those is the value of x, we just don't know which. Similarly, if S2 says x = 2 or x = 5, we know that one of those is the value of x, but we still don't know which.

Taking the two together, however, we can't have x = -2 or x = 5. If x = 5, then S1 is false ... but the statements can't be false! Same issue with x = -2: if x = -2, then S2 is false, but we can't have that either.
Join the discussion