Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

can someone explain why the conclusion cannot inferred?

Expert replies
by conquistador » Tue Dec 29, 2015 1:13 am
Look at syllogism from veritas prep

All widgets are steel.
Some widgets are red.
Therefore, some steel widgets are not red.


it is mentioned that the conclusion is not "must be true".

can someone explain the reason of why the conclusion cannot be inferred from the above premises?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Dec 29, 2015 5:59 am
Mechmeera wrote:Look at syllogism from veritas prep

All widgets are steel.
Some widgets are red.
Therefore, some steel widgets are not red.


it is mentioned that the conclusion is not "must be true".

can someone explain the reason of why the conclusion cannot be inferred from the above premises?
"some" means "at least 1"
So, the premise can be rewritten as "At least 1 steel widget is red"
This means that it's possible for ALL steel widgets are red.
So, we cannot conclude that some steel widgets are not red

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion