can some one explain?

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 1:14 pm

can some one explain?

by swapna » Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:06 pm
While depressed property values can hurt some large investors, they are potentially devastating for homeowners, whose equity-in many cases representing a life's savings-can plunge or even disappear.

a.they are potentially devastating for homeowners, whose

b.they can potentially devastate homeowners in that their

c.for homeowners, they are potentially devastating,because their

d.for homeowners, it is potentially devastating in that their

e.it can potentially devastate homeowners, whose

Answer is a. My doubt is how can "they" refer to depressed property values. The source is official guide verbal review 2nd edition pg 248. I feel it should be e.

User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 403
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:32 pm
Thanked: 98 times
Followed by:22 members

by fibbonnaci » Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:51 pm
before i go to explain what is wrong in this SC- i would like to divulge one concept on pronouns.
I feel this would help others too.
we all know about pronoun ambiguity error. But remember one thing:
-> if the pronoun is a subject , then it refers by default to the subject of the other clause.
->if the pronoun is a direct object, then it refers by default to the direct object of the other clause. (i.e., "pick the ball out of the draw and put it into this box)
Pronoun ambiguity error in essence means that if a pronoun is a subject but it needs to refer to the object of the other clause then we call the error as pronoun ambiguity. eg: pick the ball out of the box and throw it away. here the 'it' needs to refer to the box. But in this case- 'it' is an object pronoun and the object in the previous clause is 'ball'. so it looks as if the sentence is asking us to throw the ball out. this is where we say there is pronoun ambiguity.

Now lets come to our question.
Here 'they' is a subject pronoun and it refers to the subject of the previous clause- 'depressed property values'.So there is no pronoun ambiguity that occurs in this case.

a.they are potentially devastating for homeowners, whose [ No pronoun ambiguity. perfect!]

b.they can potentially devastate homeowners in that their ['They' refers to property values and 'their' refers to home owners. how can this occur? how can the possesive form of a pronoun refer to something else? Eliminated!]

c.for homeowners, they are potentially devastating,because their [ 'They' refers to property values and 'their' refers to home owners. this is not correct. Eliminated!]

d.for homeowners, it is potentially devastating in that their [what is 'it' here? 'it' does not have a proper antecedent. Eliminated!]

e.it can potentially devastate homeowners, whose ['it' does not have a proper antecedent]

Hope this helps!

User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 403
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:32 pm
Thanked: 98 times
Followed by:22 members

by fibbonnaci » Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:54 pm
And Swapna, please use the spoiler tab for the OA in your post. This is to ensure that users dont experience a bias the minute they read the question. It gives them enough scope to think independently without getting biased by the answer display.

User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1537
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:10 pm
Thanked: 653 times
Followed by:252 members

by papgust » Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:01 pm
Very nice explanation! Thank you jyothi.