Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 1 and Nov 21. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Can experts comment on this one?

Expert replies
by Winner2013 » Thu Oct 24, 2013 6:28 am
With cloning technology, scientists are approaching what has long been the ultimate goal of modern husbandry: achieving a consistency of quality and production in farm animals as once thought to be limited to manufactured goods.

(A) achieving a consistency of quality and production in farm animals as once thought to be
(B) achieving farm animals with a consistency of quality and production as were once thought of as
(C) achieving in farm animals a consistency of quality and production that was once thought to be
(D) achievement of farm animals whose consistency of quality and production are the same as what were once thought to he
(E) achievement of farm animals at a consistency of quality and production once thought of as

Pj

OA to follow
Last edited by Winner2013 on Thu Oct 24, 2013 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Abhishek009 » Thu Oct 24, 2013 6:54 am
C
Abhishek
Join the discussion

by Winner2013 » Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:57 am
yeah its C Abhishek. Can you help me understand why isnt it A?
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:21 am
When you're asking for expert advice, please be sure to state what your question/concern is. We can't really offer advice if we don't know why you're confused about the problem! Please also always list the source and the OA, so we can know if it is a reputable question or not.

There are two issues in this question: MEANING and MODIFIERS.

From a meaning perspective, what is the thing that modern husbandry is trying to achieve? We can't achieve objects like "farm animals," we can only achieve abstract goals like "consistency." Eliminate B, D, and E.

In A and C, there is no significant difference between saying "achieving a consistency in farm animals" vs. "achieving in farm animals a consistency." The placement of the prepositional phrase does not change the meaning. The primary difference is between "as once thought to be" vs. "that was once thought to be."

The consistency was thought to be limited to manufactured goods, so we want to make sure that we're MODIFYING consistency. An "as" would be providing a comparison, but would not be modifying "consistency." We need the relative pronoun "that" to set up the subordinate clause to modify "consistency."
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion