BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Can experts comment on this one?

Expert replies
by Winner2013 » Thu Oct 24, 2013 6:28 am
With cloning technology, scientists are approaching what has long been the ultimate goal of modern husbandry: achieving a consistency of quality and production in farm animals as once thought to be limited to manufactured goods.

(A) achieving a consistency of quality and production in farm animals as once thought to be
(B) achieving farm animals with a consistency of quality and production as were once thought of as
(C) achieving in farm animals a consistency of quality and production that was once thought to be
(D) achievement of farm animals whose consistency of quality and production are the same as what were once thought to he
(E) achievement of farm animals at a consistency of quality and production once thought of as

Pj

OA to follow
Last edited by Winner2013 on Thu Oct 24, 2013 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Abhishek009 » Thu Oct 24, 2013 6:54 am
C
Abhishek
Join the discussion

by Winner2013 » Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:57 am
yeah its C Abhishek. Can you help me understand why isnt it A?
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:21 am
When you're asking for expert advice, please be sure to state what your question/concern is. We can't really offer advice if we don't know why you're confused about the problem! Please also always list the source and the OA, so we can know if it is a reputable question or not.

There are two issues in this question: MEANING and MODIFIERS.

From a meaning perspective, what is the thing that modern husbandry is trying to achieve? We can't achieve objects like "farm animals," we can only achieve abstract goals like "consistency." Eliminate B, D, and E.

In A and C, there is no significant difference between saying "achieving a consistency in farm animals" vs. "achieving in farm animals a consistency." The placement of the prepositional phrase does not change the meaning. The primary difference is between "as once thought to be" vs. "that was once thought to be."

The consistency was thought to be limited to manufactured goods, so we want to make sure that we're MODIFYING consistency. An "as" would be providing a comparison, but would not be modifying "consistency." We need the relative pronoun "that" to set up the subordinate clause to modify "consistency."
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1