acon wrote:Well cheers to a fellow British Colombian. Sunshine coast is a beautiful spot! I'm down in Victoria, but grew up in Vancouver also. I checked out your site, it seems you offer a great service!
I am writing the GMAT tomorrow, and today is my first and last real day of preparations. Would have liked to have been more prepared, but time constraints don't permit much.
The following are the only other two questions that I haven't been able to figure out on my own from the GMAT Prep.
Their answer in this first one is 16, which I would have thought to be correct had the question been 32 + ...,
This one I am entirely lost in..
If anyone is able to help it would be greatly appreciated!
We must keep in wits some special triangles that the GMAT tests very recurrently, more than ever 45-45-90 and 30-60-90 ones. Your first problem is the case of a 45-45-90 triangle whose sides opposite those angles in order bear the ratio 1:1:√2. Hence, if a be each leg of the isosceles right triangle, then a √2 will be its hypotenuse and 2 a + a √2 its perimeter, which is given as 16 + 16 √2 in your problem.
Take 2 a + a √2 = 16 + 16 √2
Or a (2 + √2) = 16 + 16 √2
Or a = (16 + 16 √2)/( 2 + √2)
But we want its hypotenuse, which is a √2
Hence a √2 = (√2) (16 + 16 √2)/ (2 + √2) = (16 √2 + 32)/ (2 + √2) = 16 (2 + √2)/ (2 + √2) = 16.
Take B.
For your second problem, let's make few assumptions first, like as if ∠PRT = α so that ∠PTR = 90 - α .
Now (1) allows us to let ∠RQS = ∠RSQ = 1/2 (180 - α) = 90 - (α/2).
Whereas ∠TSU = 180 - {x+90 - (α/2)} = 90 - x + (α/2)
And of course ∠TUS = 180 - {90 - x + (α/2) + 90 - α} = 2 x - (α/2)
We can now come inside the quadrilateral PQSU that will contain the four interior angles as 90, 90 + (α/2), x, and 180 - 2 x + (α/2) such that
90 + 90 + (α/2) + x + 180 - 2 x + (α/2) = 360
Or simply, x = α. So x can be known only if α is known. Insufficient.
Now switch to statement (2). Even this information alone plus our valid assumptions take us to the same situation as it was with statement (1) alone. Hence it is too insufficient.
Now take the two statements together, I mean take ∠TSU = ∠TUS or 90 - x + (α/2) = 2 x - (α/2) with x = α, or we can now have 90 - x + (x/2) = 2 x - (x/2) or x = 45. SUFFICIENT
C.
All the best acon!