BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

can anybody answer this CR question n its logic?

Expert replies
by nitinrajasingh » Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:39 am
Alicia took neighbour's car without permission, got police attention because of defective backlight.Police excused her with some warning.
Peter also took the neirhbour's car without permission,got police attention when met with an accident by a speedy taxi and car rear was damaged.Police charged him with automobile theft.
Author: It was the speeding taxi which damaged the car,there is no fault of Peter, so both have done the same mistake of taking car without permission therefore Alicia should be charged with automobile theft.

Q: If all claims offered in support of conclusion are accurate,then each of following must be true EXCEPT:
A. The interest of justice would have been served better if both were left with warning
B. Alicia barely missed hitting pedestrian when she speed through red light 10 minutes before she was caught by police for driving with defective headlight.
C. Peter caught thrice last month for speedy driving whereas Alicia never violeted the traffic rules.
D. Alicia never took the car without permission earlier.
E. Peter's car hit by taxi while he was jumping the red light whereas Aliciadrove with extra care to avoid police attention to the car she was driving.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by gmatmachoman » Fri Jan 08, 2010 6:42 am
This one seems to be a LSAT CR.

IMO [spoiler]D![/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Fri Jan 08, 2010 6:58 am
nitinrajasingh wrote:Alicia took neighbour's car without permission, got police attention because of defective backlight.Police excused her with some warning.
Peter also took the neirhbour's car without permission,got police attention when met with an accident by a speedy taxi and car rear was damaged.Police charged him with automobile theft.
Author: It was the speeding taxi which damaged the car,there is no fault of Peter, so both have done the same mistake of taking car without permission therefore Alicia should be charged with automobile theft.

Q: If all claims offered in support of conclusion are accurate,then each of following must be true EXCEPT:
A. The interest of justice would have been served better if both were left with warning
B. Alicia barely missed hitting pedestrian when she speed through red light 10 minutes before she was caught by police for driving with defective headlight.
C. Peter caught thrice last month for speedy driving whereas Alicia never violeted the traffic rules.
D. Alicia never took the car without permission earlier.
E. Peter's car hit by taxi while he was jumping the red light whereas Aliciadrove with extra care to avoid police attention to the car she was driving.
Hi!

This question makes absolutely no sense! Aside from all of the transcription errors, the question stem suggests that 4 of the answers are valid inferences based on the information provided above. However, NONE of the answers are "must be true"s, so all 5 of them are correct!

Looking at each choice:

A) It's also possible that the interests of justice would be better served by charging both of them.
B) How do we know if Alicia barely missed hitting a pedestrian?
C) How do we know their past driving records?
D) How do we know if Alicia has previously stolen the car?
E) How do we know if Peter jumped a red light or if Alicia was super careful?

Now, B, C, D and E are all completely outside the scope. This leads me to believe that A is the correct answer to a completely different question:
If all of the statements above are true, which of the following MUST BE FALSE?
or:
If all of the statements above are true, then each of the following could be true EXCEPT:
since "must be false" and "could be true except" are different ways of asking the same question.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:06 am
Dear Stuart,

u r right..This one has "frustrated" me heavily.. Sorry for the original poster. Wondering what if Testluv or stacey would have seen this post.. Hahhaha!!

No option really fits the bill. I really tried very hard to oil my brain to get " some" answer...
Join the discussion