BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Calif elementary school

Expert replies
by ssgmatter » Sat Mar 20, 2010 10:39 pm
Recent studies have shown that there are now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, not nearly as many than there were even five years ago.
(A) there are now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, not nearly as many than there were
(B) there are now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, not nearly as many as there were
(C) there is now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, not nearly as many than there was
(D) there is now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, but that ratio is much lower than
(E) there is now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, not nearly as many as there were
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by ssgmatter » Sat Mar 20, 2010 10:39 pm
what is the problem with D here....i got this down to D and E.....i think D would be correct if it would have said like this...but that ratio is much lower than that even five years ago.....i mean that comparision part is missing...that is the comparison of the current and the past ratio....please correct me in my understanding of the options here..

Regards,
Phil
Join the discussion

by rockeyb » Sat Mar 20, 2010 11:34 pm
ssgmatter wrote:what is the problem with D here....i got this down to D and E.....i think D would be correct if it would have said like this...but that ratio is much lower than that even five years ago.....i mean that comparision part is missing...that is the comparison of the current and the past ratio....please correct me in my understanding of the options here..

Regards,
Phil
If you say but that ratio is much lower than that even five years ago in that case option d would have been correct .

A still better thing to do would be to remove THAT and use RATIO to make the meaning clearer .

Your understanding of Option D is correct .

Also since the sentence is checking for Idioms and idiom AS MANY AS would be always proffered to other sentence .

Hope this helps .
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Sat Mar 20, 2010 11:35 pm
ssgmatter wrote:what is the problem with D here....i got this down to D and E.....i think D would be correct if it would have said like this...but that ratio is much lower than that even five years ago.....i mean that comparision part is missing...that is the comparison of the current and the past ratio....please correct me in my understanding of the options here..
in d the ratio is being compared to five years ago....illogical

to make it correct the ratio has to be compared with ratio only
Join the discussion

by ssgmatter » Sun Mar 21, 2010 2:49 am
Thankyou guys!.....

You are the best...

Cheers!
Regards,
Phil
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1