BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Cakes

Expert replies
by tonebeeze » Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:58 am
Eunice sold several cakes. If each cake sold for either exactly 17 or exactly 19 dollars, how many 19 dollar cakes did Eunice sell?

1. Eunice sold a total of 8 cakes.
2. Eunice made 140 dollars in total revenue from her cakes.

OA = b
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by clock60 » Thu Apr 07, 2011 11:41 am
for sure the answer is B, but to me this problem is too time consuming,
it will be great if somebody shares any shortcut

17a+19b=?, find b-?
(1) a+b=8 not suff
(2) 17a+19b=140, we must prove the only integers for a and b exist
here b=2,a=6 (17*6+19*2=140)
and there are no others integers for a and b that give proper result
Join the discussion

by tonebeeze » Thu Apr 07, 2011 11:56 am
I agree!
Join the discussion

by ldoolitt » Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:00 pm
clock60 wrote:for sure the answer is B, but to me this problem is too time consuming,
it will be great if somebody shares any shortcut

17a+19b=?, find b-?
(1) a+b=8 not suff
(2) 17a+19b=140, we must prove the only integers for a and b exist
here b=2,a=6 (17*6+19*2=140)
and there are no others integers for a and b that give proper result
If you wanted to SOLVE the problem (ie a PS problem) first I would subtract 19b from both sides, then divide by 17

(17b/17) = (140/17) - (19a/17)

You know that the left side is an integer so the right side must also be an integer

integer = (136/17) + (4/17) - (17/17) * a - (2/17) * a
integer = integer + 4/17 - integer - (2/17) * a

therefore 4/17 - (2/17) * a must be an integer to remove fractions. a = 2 is the only positive solution that could also satisfy the stem equation (19, etc would work but couldn't possibly satisfy the original equation)
Join the discussion

by clock60 » Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:07 pm
hi Idoolitt
thanks for sharing, but can you elaborate i little bit more
why first I would subtract 19b from both sides, then divide by 17
it sounds great but why in that order
what if substract 17a from both parts and then to divide by 19?
or it does not matter?
Join the discussion

by ldoolitt » Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:14 pm
clock60 wrote:hi Idoolitt
thanks for sharing, but can you elaborate i little bit more
why first I would subtract 19b from both sides, then divide by 17
it sounds great but why in that order
what if substract 17a from both parts and then to divide by 19?
or it does not matter?
Does not matter

(19a/19) = (140/19) - (17b/19)
integer = (133/19) + (7/19) - (19/19) * b + (2/19) * b
integer = integer + 7/19 - integer + (2/19) * b
7/19 + (2/19)*b = integer

b=6 works there
Join the discussion

by clock60 » Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:17 pm
great reply!!!
thanks ldoolitt
Join the discussion