Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Cable television companies

Expert replies
by smackmartine » Mon May 23, 2011 10:13 pm
Most cable television companies currently require customers to subscribe to packages of channels, but consumer groups have recently proposed legislation that would force the companies to offer a la carte pricing. Subscribers would pay less, argue the consumer groups, because they could purchase only the desired channels. However, the cable industry argues that under the current package pricing, popular channels subsidize less-popular ones, providing more options for viewers. For this reason, the industry claims that it is always cheaper for the consumer to purchase many bundled channels than to buy them individually.

Which of the following would be most important for the government to determine before deciding whether to require cable television companies to offer a la carte pricing in order to reduce consumer costs?
A) Whether the total number of channels offered to consumers would decrease, along with programming diversity, as a result of the a la carte pricing structure
B) Whether advertising revenue for the cable television companies would decrease as a result of the a la carte pricing structure
C) Whether the vast majority of consumers would greatly reduce the number of channels purchased if given the option of purchasing them individually
D) Whether cable and satellite companies currently have the ability to buy channels individually from programmers and content providers
E) Whether a la carte subscribers would be required to have new television set-top boxes

This question has been discussed already , but I could not understand the explanations. If you guys can explain each option in short, it will really be helpful.
OA after some discussion.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by HSPA » Mon May 23, 2011 11:18 pm
smackmartine wrote:Most cable television companies currently require customers to subscribe to packages of channels, but consumer groups have recently proposed legislation that would force the companies to offer a la carte pricing. Subscribers would pay less, argue the consumer groups, because they could purchase only the desired channels. However, the cable industry argues that under the current package pricing, popular channels subsidize less-popular ones, providing more options for viewers. For this reason, the industry claims that it is always cheaper for the consumer to purchase many bundled channels than to buy them individually.

Which of the following would be most important for the government to determine before deciding whether to require cable television companies to offer a la carte pricing in order to reduce consumer costs?
A) Whether the total number of channels offered to consumers would decrease, along with programming diversity, as a result of the a la carte pricing structure
B) Whether advertising revenue for the cable television companies would decrease as a result of the a la carte pricing structure
C) Whether the vast majority of consumers would greatly reduce the number of channels purchased if given the option of purchasing them individually
D) Whether cable and satellite companies currently have the ability to buy channels individually from programmers and content providers [Out of scope]
E) Whether a la carte subscribers would be required to have new television set-top boxes [Out of scope]

.
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by smackmartine » Tue May 24, 2011 12:40 am
OA is C
Join the discussion

by clock60 » Tue May 24, 2011 12:20 pm
hi guys
i was between A and C and finally chose A
can somebody explain why A is wrong?
thanks
Join the discussion

by newton9 » Tue May 24, 2011 12:39 pm
A) Whether the total number of channels offered to consumers would decrease, along with programming diversity, as a result of the a la carte pricing structure

A tells us that number of channels will be reduced. Industry claims that it is always cheaper to purchase packages. C clearly tells us that vast majority of consumers would greatly reduce no of channels -- implying that many consumers are overpaying.

A just tells about the number of channels and never mentions about the ala-carte pricing vs packaged pricing.
Join the discussion