BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Byrne and some of his friends go out to dinner and spend $111, excluding tax and tip. If the group included both men and

Expert replies
by BTGModeratorVI » Sun Apr 05, 2020 9:11 am

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Byrne and some of his friends go out to dinner and spend $111, excluding tax and tip. If the group included both men and women, how many men were in the group?

(1) There are a total of five people at the table, including Byrne.
(2) The women order meals that cost an average of $19 and the men order meals that cost and average of $27.

Answer: B
Source: Princeton Review
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

BTGModeratorVI wrote:
Sun Apr 05, 2020 9:11 am
Byrne and some of his friends go out to dinner and spend $111, excluding tax and tip. If the group included both men and women, how many men were in the group?

(1) There are a total of five people at the table, including Byrne.
(2) The women order meals that cost an average of $19 and the men order meals that cost and average of $27.

Answer: B
Source: Princeton Review
Given: Byrne and some of his friends go out to dinner and spend $111, excluding tax and tip.

Target question: How many men were in the group?

Statement 1: There are a total of five people at the table, including Byrne.
No idea how many of these 5 people are men.
Statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: The women order meals that cost an average of $19 and the men order meals that cost an average of $27.
Let M = # of men in the group
Let W = # of women in the group
Since the total cost is $111, we can write: 19W + 27M = 111
Since W and M must be POSITIVE INTEGERS, we can see that there aren't many possible solutions to the red equation above.
Since we're told there's at least 1 woman, let's start there.

If W = 1, we get: 19(1) + 27M = 111
Simplify: 27M = 92
So, M = 92/27, which does NOT simplify to be a POSITIVE INTEGER.
So, it cannot be the case that there is 1 woman

If W = 2, we get: 19(2) + 27M = 111
Simplify: 27M = 73
So, M = 73/27, which does NOT simplify to be a POSITIVE INTEGER.
So, it cannot be the case that there are 2 women

If W = 3, we get: 19(3) + 27M = 111
Simplify: 27M = 73
So, M = 54/27 = 2
So, it's POSSIBLE that the group has 3 women and 2 men

If W = 4, we get: 19(4) + 27M = 111
Simplify: 27M = 35
So, M = 35/27, which does NOT simplify to be a POSITIVE INTEGER.
So, it cannot be the case that there are 4 women

If W = 5, we get: 19(5) + 27M = 111
Simplify: 27M = 16
So, M = 16/27, which does NOT simplify to be a POSITIVE INTEGER.
So, it cannot be the case that there are 5 women

If W = 6, we get: 19(6) + 27M = 111
Simplify: 27M = -3
At this point, we can STOP, since all integer values of W greater than 5 will result in a negative number of men (which is impossible).

Since there was only ONE CASE in which W and M are POSITIVE INTEGERS, we can be certain that the answer to the target question is there are 2 men in the group
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Answer: B

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

Given that Byrne and his friends spent $111 on dinner excluding tax and tip.
Question => how many men were in the group?
Let the number of men = M
Let the number of women = W
Find M

Statement 1 => There are a total of five people at the table including Byrne
Therefore, Byrne and his friends = 5 people
5 people which consists of both men and women spent $111 on dinner, the number of men or women from this 5 friends is unknown so the target question cannot be answered and statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2=> The women order meals that cost an average of $19 and the men order meals that cost an average of $27
If 1 man spent $27, then M men spent $27M
If 1 woman spent $19, then women spent $19W
19W + 27M = 111
The value of W and M has to be a whole number, positive integers and at least 1 because we are dealing with human head-count and they cannot be 0 due to their average cost. So, by using trial and error;
If W = 1 then 19 (1) + 27M = 111 ; M = 92/27
If W = 2 then 19 (2) + 27M = 111 ; M = 73/27
If W = 3 then 19 (3) + 27M = 111 ; M = 54/27 = 2
If W = 4 then 19 (4) + 27M = 111 ; M = 35/27
If W = 5 then 19 (5) + 27M = 111 ; M = 16/27
If W = 6 then 19 (6) + 27M = 111 ; M = -3/27 = -1/9
$$When\ W\ge6,$$
The value of M become negative and the only case that satisfies the value of M is when W = 3 then M = 2, hence number of men = 2
Statement 2 alone is SUFFICIENT
Answer = B
Join the discussion