BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of complete EA OnDemand
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court

Expert replies
by pnk » Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:04 am
OG

By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central Intelligence Agency broad discretionary
powers enabling it to withhold from the public the identities of its sources of intelligence information.

(A) enabling it to withhold from the public
(B) for it to withhold from the public
(C) for withholding disclosure to the public of
(D) that enable them to withhold from public disclosure
(E) that they can withhold public disclosure of

[spoiler][spoiler][spoiler]OA: A.

My specific doubt is on 'it' in A. Does it refer to Supreme Court or CIA....how to decide!![/spoiler][/spoiler][/spoiler]
Last edited by pnk on Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by kvcpk » Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:31 am
Good question.. I have the same doubt..
Join the discussion

by hardik.jadeja » Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:32 am
Just a humble request. From now on, please underline the part of sentence in question.
Join the discussion

by hardik.jadeja » Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:39 am
I have the same doubt but still I could choose the right answer. Because the idiom being tested here is "withhold from X Y", where X is the entity we are withholding from and Y is the thing we are withholding.

Only two options A and B are using the idiom correctly. B is wordy and awkward so the answer is A.
Join the discussion

by rockeyb » Mon Jun 14, 2010 9:02 am
pnk wrote:OG

By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central Intelligence Agency broad discretionary
powers enabling it to withhold from the public the identities of its sources of intelligence information.

(A) enabling it to withhold from the public
(B) for it to withhold from the public
(C) for withholding disclosure to the public of
(D) that enable them to withhold from public disclosure
(E) that they can withhold public disclosure of

[spoiler][spoiler][spoiler]OA: A.

My specific doubt is on 'it' in A. Does it refer to Supreme Court or CIA....how to decide!![/spoiler][/spoiler][/spoiler]
IT here is referring to CIA . IT here can not refer to Supreme Court as Supreme Court is awarding the powers to CIA and this power enables CIA to withhold ..............

Replacing IT with Supreme Court dose not makes sense .
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by missionGMAT007 » Mon Jun 14, 2010 9:52 am
The only answer is A
We do not have to be nit picky in the case of pronoun reference. Just think about the logic -> Can SC award CIA discretionary powers enabling supreme court to withhold anything? - 'it' must refer to CIA there is need of confusion here.

hope this helps
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1