Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Builder

Expert replies
by GmatKiss » Fri Aug 12, 2011 1:46 am
A master builder is building a new house. He gets 3 apprentices who EACH work 2/3 as fast as he does. If all 4 work on it together, they should finish it in what fraction of the time that it would have taken the master builder working alone?

a)4/7
b)1/3
c)2/3
d)3/4
e)4/3

[spoiler]OA: B[/spoiler]
Last edited by GmatKiss on Fri Aug 12, 2011 5:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by bubbliiiiiiii » Fri Aug 12, 2011 2:04 am
let the rate of work of master be x.

rate of work of each apprentice is 2x/3.

rate of work of 3 apprentices is 2x/3 * 3= 2x.

Combined rate of all four is 3x.

Let the piece of work be n.

then,

if master at rate x can do the work in n units then the team at rate 3x can do in n/3.

Thus, B

Please let me know if the approach is correct or not.
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by pemdas » Fri Aug 12, 2011 2:22 am
i also think it's b

the rate of three workers is 2x/3 and the rate of builder is x
(2x/3)*3 + x = work, given One work, work=1 ==> (2x/3)*3+x=1, x=1/3
the speed of builder is 1/3 work per time unit and the combined speed of three workers is (1/3)*(2/3)*3 or 2/3 work per time unit. Builder and three workers have combined speed of 1 work per time unit.

So if all 4 work they do one work in 1 time unit. If builder does one work alone, he spends 3 time units. The relationship is 1/3.
GmatKiss wrote:A master builder is building a new house. He gets 3 apprentices who EACH work 2/3 as fast as he does. If all 4 work on it together, they should finish it in what fraction of the time that it would have taken the master builder working alone?

a)4/7
b)1/3
c)2/3
d)3/4
e)4/3
Success doesn't come overnight!
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Aug 12, 2011 3:38 am
GmatKiss wrote:A master builder is building a new house. He gets 3 apprentices who EACH work 2/3 as fast as he does. If all 4 work on it together, they should finish it in what fraction of the time that it would have taken the master builder working alone?

a)4/7
b)1/3
c)2/3
d)3/4
e)4/3
Let work = 18 units.
Let rate for master builder = 3 units per hour.
Then rate for each apprentice = (2/3)*3 = 2 units per hour.
Combined rate for master builder and 3 apprentices = 3 + (3*2) = 9 units per hour.
Time for all workers = w/r = 18/9 = 2 hours.
Time for master builder alone = w/r = 18/3 = 6 hours.
Time for all workers/Time for master builder alone = 2/6 = 1/3.

The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by bubbliiiiiiii » Fri Aug 12, 2011 4:20 am
Thanks mitch for acknowledging the answer and providing us with a plug-in approach.

A question here:

Why/How can we reach the answer by using the work done per day concept to reach the answer. I tried to do that and got 11/3 as my answer.
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Aug 12, 2011 4:33 am
bubbliiiiiiii wrote:Thanks mitch for acknowledging the answer and providing us with a plug-in approach.

A question here:

Why/How can we reach the answer by using the work done per day concept to reach the answer. I tried to do that and got 11/3 as my answer.
Let x = master builder rate.
Time for master builder = 1/x.

Rate for each apprentice = (2/3)x.
Rate for 3 apprentices = 3*(2/3)x = 2x.
Combined rate for master builder and 3 apprentices = x + 2x = 3x.
Time for all workers = 1/(3x).

Time for all workers/Time for master builder alone = [1/(3x)] / (1/x) = 1/(3x) * x = 1/3.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by bubbliiiiiiii » Fri Aug 12, 2011 4:52 am
Thanks again for response. :)

I was approaching it this way.

Let x = master builder rate.
Time for master builder = 1/x.

Rate for each apprentice = (2/3)x.
Time for each apprentice = 1/[(2/3)x] = 3/(2x)

Time for all workers = 1/x+3*[3/(2x)] {Time for master = 3 * Time for each apprentice}


1/x + 9/2x = 11/(2x).

What is wrong with bold faced statements. When do we use that approach?
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Aug 12, 2011 6:31 am
bubbliiiiiiii wrote: Time for each apprentice = 1/[(2/3)x] = 3/(2x)

Time for all workers = 1/x+3*[3/(2x)] {Time for master = 3 * Time for each apprentice}
Times can't be added in this manner. When elements work together, more work is produced in less time, so the amount of time needed is reduced.

If it takes John 2 days to produce 4 widgets and Mike 3 days to produce 4 widgets, it will NOT take John and Mike 2+3 = 5 days to produce 4 widgets: since John and Mike will be working together, the time will be reduced considerably.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion