BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

mgmat sc-parents

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pmFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 33 times
by pradeepkaushal9518 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:51 am
Elderly patients, many who take expensive brand-name medications daily, could reduce their medical costs by switching to generic drugs and making lifestyle changes.

many who
many of them who
and many of them who
many of whom
many of which
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pmFollowed by: 7 members
Thanked: 215 times

by kvcpk » Tue Jul 13, 2010 3:02 am
many of whom

IMO D
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 9:14 amFollowed by: 2 members
Location: Pune, India
Thanked: 31 times

by adi_800 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:31 am
Now it seems that Manhattan has too started copy pasting questions from OG...
Was nt expecting this from Manhattan...
Same question..subject changed..same concept.. Question present in OG11.
These kinda questions in the tests raise the score of the exam taker and do not represent the actual level....
:(
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 31 times

by paes » Tue Jul 13, 2010 8:28 am
IMO C

OA please ??
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pmFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 33 times

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 10:51 am
adi 800 whatever it may be mangattan is for Gmat and og is bible for Gmat so its good that it is clearing the concept of question in the bible( og). i think u should reply the question rather criticizing Manhattan's strategy. do u know kaplan takeover manhattan now u will face kaplan questions in manhattan tests
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pmFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 33 times

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 11:02 am
paes what happened to u? plz conc on your verbal part else u will come down to my level of score. i want to know what is yr current level. i m still beetween 500 to 600 level.

praveen plz tell why u have not choosen B?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pmFollowed by: 7 members
Thanked: 215 times

by kvcpk » Tue Jul 13, 2010 11:09 am
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote: praveen plz tell why u have not choosen B?
in "many of them who" - them and who are redundant. Both are referring back to elderly patients which is unnecessary.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 31 times

by paes » Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:27 pm
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:paes what happened to u? plz conc on your verbal part else u will come down to my level of score. i want to know what is yr current level. i m still beetween 500 to 600 level.

praveen plz tell why u have not choosen B?
well said Pradeep.

Actually I was going to select D but it was looking wordy to me.
See :
Elderly patients, many of whom take <>
can be written more effectively by
Elderly patients, who take <>

So I thought D is wordy/redundant.

Then I scanned the other choices. C was making some sense
Elderly patients, and many of them who take expensive brand-name medications daily, could reduce their medical costs by switching to generic drugs and making lifestyle changes.

Here I am seeing two groups
1. Elderly patients AND
2. many of them who take expensive brand-name

So I selected C.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 31 times

by paes » Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:37 pm
OA is D.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/manhatan-sc-5-t8709.html

But I don't agree with OA.
D is equivalent to:

Elderly patients, many of them(whom) take expensive brand-name medications daily, could reduce their medical costs by switching to generic drugs and making lifestyle changes.

from the meaning, the sentence should be -> elders (who take expansive drugs c) .could reduce .....

' who take expansive drugs' is necessary for the right meaning but D is putting it like an extra info.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pmFollowed by: 7 members
Thanked: 215 times

by kvcpk » Tue Jul 13, 2010 8:08 pm
paes wrote: Actually I was going to select D but it was looking wordy to me.
See :
Elderly patients, many of whom take <>
can be written more effectively by
Elderly patients, who take <>

So I thought D is wordy/redundant.
Hi Paes,

The meaning of both the sentences above is different.
The first sentence says many of the elderly patients. (NOT ALL)
Second says Elderly Patients (means ALL)

Hope this helps!!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 31 times

by paes » Wed Jul 14, 2010 1:37 am
kvcp,

You are wrong here.

When we say :

Elderly patients, who take expensive brand-name medications daily, could reduce their medical costs by switching to generic drugs and making lifestyle changes.

We are talking only about those patients who take expensive medicines.

See the similar example :

People who speak two languages are called bilingual. [ https://www.englishlanguageguide.com/eng ... ronoun.asp ]

that's why I selected C over D.
I found no grammatical mistake with C,
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pmFollowed by: 7 members
Thanked: 215 times

by kvcpk » Wed Jul 14, 2010 2:21 am
paes wrote:When we say :

Elderly patients, who take expensive brand-name medications daily, could reduce their medical costs by switching to generic drugs and making lifestyle changes.

We are talking only about those patients who take expensive medicines.
You are right about your example. But the intended meaning of the sentence is different.

"We are talking only about those patients who take expensive medicines." is WRONG
The original sentence is not speaking about those patients who take expensive medicines.

It is infact speaking about all elderly patients. It is just giving us additional information that many of them take expensive medicines.

Hope this helps. Let me know in case you need more info.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 305
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 5:38 am
Thanked: 10 times

by Shawshank » Wed Jul 14, 2010 2:28 am
paes wrote:kvcp,

You are wrong here.

When we say :

Elderly patients, who take expensive brand-name medications daily, could reduce their medical costs by switching to generic drugs and making lifestyle changes.

We are talking only about those patients who take expensive medicines.

See the similar example :

People who speak two languages are called bilingual. [ https://www.englishlanguageguide.com/eng ... ronoun.asp ]

that's why I selected C over D.
I found no grammatical mistake with C,
In this case,,, Does'nt WHO represent Elderly Parents (Subject),,,,
Is'nt WHOM wrong in this context..
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Shawshank Redemtion -- Hope is still alive ...
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 31 times

by paes » Wed Jul 14, 2010 2:31 am
Read my post above. I am not convinced with the OA-D.
C looks better to me, at leas no grammar mistake.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pmFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 33 times

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Wed Jul 14, 2010 2:48 am
paes i dont no why whom doest not look correct to me so i have choosen " many of them who" and u are saying " and many of them who".

why u have choosen C not B ( or why and is required here)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked