BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

BTG practice question -- sets

Expert replies
by aleph777 » Tue Feb 15, 2011 4:24 am
Another BTG question I'm not so sure about re: phrasing.

K is a set of integers such that

i) if x is in K, then 2x is in K

ii) if each of x and y is in K, then x + y is in K

Is 15 in K?

(1) 1 is in K.

(2) 3 is in K.


OA is D. I saw the potential for that answer, but I also thought, "hmm, maybe it's a trap," and I was stuck between choosing D and E because I think I've seen OG questions before with a similar phrasing where you aren't allowed to think beyond the first instance of x and 2x, etc. Is this confusingly worded or will any question on the GMAT expect you to think infinitely unless otherwise told?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by ankur.agrawal » Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:01 am
IMO D.
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:42 am
i) K {i ... integers} {i, 2i ...}
ii) K {i ... integers} (i, i+i ...}
Is 15 in K?

st(1) x=1, K {1, 2, 3, 4 ...15} Sufficient
st(2) x=3, K {3, 6, 9, 12, 15...} Sufficient
IOM D

it's very unlikely that we will see this kind of wording, because this question is in our thread

aleph777 wrote:Another BTG question I'm not so sure about re: phrasing.
K is a set of integers such that

i) if x is in K, then 2x is in K
ii) if each of x and y is in K, then x + y is in K
Is 15 in K?

(1) 1 is in K.
(2) 3 is in K.

OA is D. I saw the potential for that answer, but I also thought, "hmm, maybe it's a trap," and I was stuck between choosing D and E because I think I've seen OG questions before with a similar phrasing where you aren't allowed to think beyond the first instance of x and 2x, etc. Is this confusingly worded or will any question on the GMAT expect you to think infinitely unless otherwise told?
Join the discussion

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:35 pm
aleph777 wrote:Another BTG question I'm not so sure about re: phrasing.

K is a set of integers such that

i) if x is in K, then 2x is in K

ii) if each of x and y is in K, then x + y is in K

Is 15 in K?

(1) 1 is in K.

(2) 3 is in K.


OA is D. I saw the potential for that answer, but I also thought, "hmm, maybe it's a trap," and I was stuck between choosing D and E because I think I've seen OG questions before with a similar phrasing where you aren't allowed to think beyond the first instance of x and 2x, etc. Is this confusingly worded or will any question on the GMAT expect you to think infinitely unless otherwise told?
Every question will expect you to follow the statements wherever they go, even recursively, as this one. Very few questions will use the concept to infinity, though. In this particular case, though, there's no ambiguity:
if x is in K, then 2x is in K.
So if according to (1), 1 is in K, this means that 2*1=2 is in K.
If 2 is in K, then 4 is in K.
If 4 is in K, then 8 is in K.
If 8 is in K, then 16 is in k.
etc. etc.
recursivity follows from the definition of the question stem, and there's no limit - nothing stopping (such as K only includes 2 terms, or some other limiting factor).
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion