BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

BTG practice question -- sets

Expert replies
by aleph777 » Tue Feb 15, 2011 4:24 am
Another BTG question I'm not so sure about re: phrasing.

K is a set of integers such that

i) if x is in K, then 2x is in K

ii) if each of x and y is in K, then x + y is in K

Is 15 in K?

(1) 1 is in K.

(2) 3 is in K.


OA is D. I saw the potential for that answer, but I also thought, "hmm, maybe it's a trap," and I was stuck between choosing D and E because I think I've seen OG questions before with a similar phrasing where you aren't allowed to think beyond the first instance of x and 2x, etc. Is this confusingly worded or will any question on the GMAT expect you to think infinitely unless otherwise told?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by ankur.agrawal » Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:01 am
IMO D.
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:42 am
i) K {i ... integers} {i, 2i ...}
ii) K {i ... integers} (i, i+i ...}
Is 15 in K?

st(1) x=1, K {1, 2, 3, 4 ...15} Sufficient
st(2) x=3, K {3, 6, 9, 12, 15...} Sufficient
IOM D

it's very unlikely that we will see this kind of wording, because this question is in our thread

aleph777 wrote:Another BTG question I'm not so sure about re: phrasing.
K is a set of integers such that

i) if x is in K, then 2x is in K
ii) if each of x and y is in K, then x + y is in K
Is 15 in K?

(1) 1 is in K.
(2) 3 is in K.

OA is D. I saw the potential for that answer, but I also thought, "hmm, maybe it's a trap," and I was stuck between choosing D and E because I think I've seen OG questions before with a similar phrasing where you aren't allowed to think beyond the first instance of x and 2x, etc. Is this confusingly worded or will any question on the GMAT expect you to think infinitely unless otherwise told?
Join the discussion

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:35 pm
aleph777 wrote:Another BTG question I'm not so sure about re: phrasing.

K is a set of integers such that

i) if x is in K, then 2x is in K

ii) if each of x and y is in K, then x + y is in K

Is 15 in K?

(1) 1 is in K.

(2) 3 is in K.


OA is D. I saw the potential for that answer, but I also thought, "hmm, maybe it's a trap," and I was stuck between choosing D and E because I think I've seen OG questions before with a similar phrasing where you aren't allowed to think beyond the first instance of x and 2x, etc. Is this confusingly worded or will any question on the GMAT expect you to think infinitely unless otherwise told?
Every question will expect you to follow the statements wherever they go, even recursively, as this one. Very few questions will use the concept to infinity, though. In this particular case, though, there's no ambiguity:
if x is in K, then 2x is in K.
So if according to (1), 1 is in K, this means that 2*1=2 is in K.
If 2 is in K, then 4 is in K.
If 4 is in K, then 8 is in K.
If 8 is in K, then 16 is in k.
etc. etc.
recursivity follows from the definition of the question stem, and there's no limit - nothing stopping (such as K only includes 2 terms, or some other limiting factor).
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion