BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Britain's economic growth was slower in the mid-1970's

Expert replies
by aditya8062 » Tue Jun 24, 2014 4:15 am
Britain's economic growth was slower in the mid-1970's and its decline much more rapid in the subsequent recession than the United States.
A. Britain's economic growth was slower in the mid-1970's and its decline much more rapid in the subsequent recession than the United States.
B. The economic growth of Britain was slower in the mid-1970's and it declined much more rapidly in the subsequent recession than the United States did.
C. Britain's economy, which grew more slowly in the mid-1970's, also had declined much more rapidly in the subsequent recession than the United States did.
D. The economy of Britain grew more slowly in the mid-1970's and declined much more rapidly in the subsequent recession than did the economy of the United States.
E. Britain's economy grew more slowly in the mid-1970's and its decline was much more rapid during the subsequent recession than the economy of the United States.


my doubt : is option E wrong because of faulty comparison in the second half of the it

E says : Britain's economy grew more slowly in the mid-1970's and its decline was much more rapid during the subsequent recession than the economy of the United States.


my reasoning : by default "its" will refer to "Britain's" so the comparison in the second part becomes: Britain's decline was much more rapid during the subsequent recession than the economy of the United States---->thereby making a faulty comparison between "Britain's decline" and "economy of the United States"
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Jun 24, 2014 4:51 am
aditya8062 wrote: my doubt : is option E wrong because of faulty comparison in the second half of the it

E says : Britain's economy grew more slowly in the mid-1970's and its decline was much more rapid during the subsequent recession than the economy of the United States.


my reasoning : by default "its" will refer to "Britain's" so the comparison in the second part becomes: Britain's decline was much more rapid during the subsequent recession than the economy of the United States---->thereby making a faulty comparison between "Britain's decline" and "economy of the United States"
E: Britain's economy grew more slowly in the mid-1970's and its decline was much more rapid during the subsequent recession than the economy of the United States.
Here, the default referent for its is Britain's -- the preceding possessive -- yielding the following faulty comparison:
Britain's decline was much more rapid during the subsequent recession than the economy of the United States [was rapid].
The words in brackets are omitted, but their presence is implied.
Errors:
The DECLINE of Britain cannot be compared to the ECONOMY of the United States.
While E implies that BRITAIN itself declined, the intended meaning seems to be that Britain's ECONOMY declined.
The economy of the United States was rapid conveys a nonsensical meaning.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by aditya8062 » Tue Jun 24, 2014 5:05 am
thanks a lot GURU
i want to ask u one more thing : in Manhattan SC guide it is said that "pronouns" cannot refer to nouns that act as adjectives
for example : the park ranger discussed measures to prevent severe wildfires, which could be devastating to it ---->incorrect sentence because "it" should refer to "park", which actually exist as adjective rather than as noun

NOW my concern: is such a rule not there for "possessive pronouns"? because "possessive pronoun" when refer to "possessive nouns" then such "possessive nouns" are actually adjective, as is in the above SC

PS : if u find my question difficult to read out( may be because of my not so clear writing skills) please tell me and i will rephrase it

regards
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Jun 24, 2014 5:39 am
aditya8062 wrote:thanks a lot GURU
i want to ask u one more thing : in Manhattan SC guide it is said that "pronouns" cannot refer to nouns that act as adjectives
for example : the park ranger discussed measures to prevent severe wildfires, which could be devastating to it ---->incorrect sentence because "it" should refer to "park", which actually exist as adjective rather than as noun

NOW my concern: is such a rule not there for "possessive pronouns"? because "possessive pronoun" when refer to "possessive nouns" then such "possessive nouns" are actually adjective, as is in the above SC

PS : if u find my question difficult to read out( may be because of my not so clear writing skills) please tell me and i will rephrase it

regards
The park ranger discussed measures to prevent severe wildfires, which could be devastating to it.
Here, park serves not as a noun but as an ADJECTIVE describing the ranger.
The intended referent for it (object pronoun) is the park.
An object pronoun cannot serve to refer to an adjective.
Thus, the sentence above is incorrect.

E: Britain's economy grew more slowly in the mid-1970's and its decline was much more rapid.
Here, its (possessive pronoun) can serve to refer to Britain's (preceding possessive).
The reason is that both the possessive pronoun and the preceding possessive serve as ADJECTIVES.
That said, a reader might wonder whether the intended referent for its is not Britain itself but Britain's ECONOMY.
For this reason, we should look for an answer choice that makes the intended meaning crystal clear.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by aditya8062 » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:30 am
The reason is that both the possessive pronoun and the preceding possessive serve as ADJECTIVES.
thanks for this reason !!
Join the discussion

by Elmirahon » Wed Jun 25, 2014 4:23 am
Hi Everyone!

Can you please post the correct answer. My answer is D.

Thank you
aditya8062 wrote:Britain's economic growth was slower in the mid-1970's and its decline much more rapid in the subsequent recession than the United States.
A. Britain's economic growth was slower in the mid-1970's and its decline much more rapid in the subsequent recession than the United States.
B. The economic growth of Britain was slower in the mid-1970's and it declined much more rapidly in the subsequent recession than the United States did.
C. Britain's economy, which grew more slowly in the mid-1970's, also had declined much more rapidly in the subsequent recession than the United States did.
D. The economy of Britain grew more slowly in the mid-1970's and declined much more rapidly in the subsequent recession than did the economy of the United States.
E. Britain's economy grew more slowly in the mid-1970's and its decline was much more rapid during the subsequent recession than the economy of the United States.


my doubt : is option E wrong because of faulty comparison in the second half of the it

E says : Britain's economy grew more slowly in the mid-1970's and its decline was much more rapid during the subsequent recession than the economy of the United States.


my reasoning : by default "its" will refer to "Britain's" so the comparison in the second part becomes: Britain's decline was much more rapid during the subsequent recession than the economy of the United States---->thereby making a faulty comparison between "Britain's decline" and "economy of the United States"
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1