BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Brain scans of people exposed to certain neurotoxins reveal

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Mon May 28, 2018 2:32 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Brain scans of people exposed to certain neurotoxins reveal brain damage identical to that found in people suffering from Parkinson's disease. This fact shows not only that these neurotoxins cause this type of brain damage, but also that the brain damage itself causes Parkinson's disease. Thus brain scans can be used to determine who is likely to develop Parkinson's disease.

The argument contains which one of the following reasoning errors?

(A) It fails to establish that other methods that can be used to diagnose Parkinson's disease are less accurate than brain scans.

(B) It overestimates the importance of early diagnosis in determining appropriate treatments for people suffering from Parkinson's disease.

(C) It mistakes a correlation between the type of brain damage described and Parkinson's disease for a causal relation between the two.

(D) It assumes that people would want to know as early as possible whether they were likely to develop Parkinson's disease.

{E} It neglects to specify how the information provided by brain scans could be used either in treating Parkinson's disease or in monitoring the progression of the disease.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:24 am
Option A Wrong
Brain scans reveals brain damage when diagnoised automatically means the patient is close to or already suffering from Parkison's disease. It has nothing to do with other methods since one could lead to other with regards to medical examination.

Option B: Wrong
In fact, it is contrary here because the importance of such diagnosis is and should be timely enough in other to help cater for it so early too. It doesn't over-estimate the importance whatsoever contrary to the supposition of the option of the statement.

Option C: Wrong
It did not elaborate on the typology of brain damage neither did it infer that the diseases are caused by the same causal agents. it'd be however speculative to think in a manner that hasn't been proven by any medical examination.

Option D: Wrong
This is wrong from the passage statement. The aim of the patient was to test for brain damage and not parkison's disease although it'd be known to him that he/she is at the verge of been tested positive to parkison's disease because the two has identical relationship.

Option E: Right
This is so correct. As it seems, the aim of this diagnosis is to determine if there's brain damage and not majorly Parkison's disease so it should be expected that the treatment procedures would be specifically for brain damage and not for Parkison's disease. This was aptly captured by the question's specification.
Join the discussion