BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

both sides vs Each sides

Expert replies
by FINALCOUNTDOWN » Fri Dec 18, 2009 5:43 am
The complex tax dispute between the Covered Bridge Mall and Harris Township is not likely to be adjudicated for several years, and, in the meantime, both sides are intent on creating difficulties for the other.
(A) both sides are intent on creating difficulties for the other
(B) both sides are intent on creating difficulties for each other.
(C) each side is intent on creating difficulties for the other
(D) each side is intent on creating difficulties for one another
(E) the sides are both intent on creating difficulties for each other.

How does A ,B and D convey different meaning.
OA-C
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by mehravikas » Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:06 pm
Please use spoiler to hide the OA and underline the sentence.
FINALCOUNTDOWN wrote:The complex tax dispute between the Covered Bridge Mall and Harris Township is not likely to be adjudicated for several years, and, in the meantime, both sides are intent on creating difficulties for the other.
(A) both sides are intent on creating difficulties for the other
(B) both sides are intent on creating difficulties for each other.
(C) each side is intent on creating difficulties for the other
(D) each side is intent on creating difficulties for one another
(E) the sides are both intent on creating difficulties for each other.

How does A ,B and D convey different meaning.
OA-C
Join the discussion

by nervesofsteel » Sun Dec 20, 2009 1:42 pm
why B is wrong..??

should it be one another instead od each other...??
Join the discussion

by hrishi19884 » Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:28 am
Definitely the answer should be C. Below is the explanation :

(A) both sides are intent on creating difficulties for the other

Here, " both sides.....for the other" indicate there are three parties/groups involved in the conversation and two of them are creating difficulties for other(third one).

But this is not true as only two groups are involved here. Hence A is incorrect.

(B) both sides are intent on creating difficulties for each other.

Here, using "both+noun..........each other" is an incorrect idiom
The correct idiom is "both+noun........one another". Hence B is incorrect.

(C) each side is intent on creating difficulties for the other.
Here "each side ....for the other" is the correct use of idiom. It significantly reflects that there are only two groups involved here. Hence C is the best choice.

(D) each side is intent on creating difficulties for one another.

Again, "each side........for one another" incorrect idiom. It should have been "both sides .....for one another".
Hence D is incorrect.

(E) the sides are both intent on creating difficulties for each other.

This is obviously wrong. "both intent on...." doesn't make any sense as verb(is/are) is not itself used.
Hence incorrect.

Let me know if you still don't get it! Happy to assist you:-)
Hrishi

"As you sow, so shall you reap"
Join the discussion

by mmslf75 » Tue Dec 22, 2009 11:49 am
hrishi19884 wrote:Definitely the answer should be C. Below is the explanation :

(A) both sides are intent on creating difficulties for the other

Here, " both sides.....for the other" indicate there are three parties/groups involved in the conversation and two of them are creating difficulties for other(third one).

But this is not true as only two groups are involved here. Hence A is incorrect.

(B) both sides are intent on creating difficulties for each other.

Here, using "both+noun..........each other" is an incorrect idiom
The correct idiom is "both+noun........one another". Hence B is incorrect.

(C) each side is intent on creating difficulties for the other.
Here "each side ....for the other" is the correct use of idiom. It significantly reflects that there are only two groups involved here. Hence C is the best choice.

(D) each side is intent on creating difficulties for one another.

Again, "each side........for one another" incorrect idiom. It should have been "both sides .....for one another".
Hence D is incorrect.

(E) the sides are both intent on creating difficulties for each other.

This is obviously wrong. "both intent on...." doesn't make any sense as verb(is/are) is not itself used.
Hence incorrect.

Let me know if you still don't get it! Happy to assist you:-)
hrishi,

Ur reasoning for A is incorrect. ;-)

OTHER -> only 2 things
ANOTHER -> No : of Options ...more than "OTHER"
EACH OTHER --> Interaction between exactly 2 entities
ONE ANOTHER --> Interaction between more than 2 entities
Join the discussion

by hrishi19884 » Tue Dec 22, 2009 12:29 pm
No, I don't agree to you. Try relating it by taking different examples, you will note the difference.
Hrishi

"As you sow, so shall you reap"
Join the discussion

by mmslf75 » Wed Dec 23, 2009 8:24 am
hrishi19884 wrote:No, I don't agree to you. Try relating it by taking different examples, you will note the difference.
I have quoted wat Ron has explained on MGMAT Forum !!
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:01 am
"each other" is definitely used for exactly two people/entities. however, i'm not sure that "one another" must be used for more than two.
all the sources i've checked say that "one another" is fine for any number that's at least 2. these sources mention that there have occasionally been people who have claimed that you can't use "one another" for only 2 people/entities, but that there is little merit to those claims.

in any case, just know:
* "each other" MUST be used for exactly 2 things
* "one another" --> definitely ok for more than 2 things; probably also ok for just 2 things, although we should wait until we see an OFFICIAL problem to decide.

by the way, i have not passed judgment on this issue before. in fact, here's a post from sept. 13 of this year, in which i said the same thing - we should wait until we have evidence from an official problem:
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/pos ... tml#p30621

--

i agree that (c) is the best of these choices, but i don't see a good reason why (b) is definitively wrong - it's just not as "pretty" as (c).
what's the source of this problem? why doesn't anyone ever say where these problems are from?
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by agganitk » Sat Jul 10, 2010 11:42 pm
What is wrong with option B ?
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Sun Jul 11, 2010 2:37 am
FINALCOUNTDOWN wrote:The complex tax dispute between the Covered Bridge Mall and Harris Township is not likely to be adjudicated for several years, and, in the meantime, both sides are intent on creating difficulties for the other.
(A) both sides are intent on creating difficulties for the other
(B) both sides are intent on creating difficulties for each other.
(C) each side is intent on creating difficulties for the other
(D) each side is intent on creating difficulties for one another
(E) the sides are both intent on creating difficulties for each other.

How does A ,B and D convey different meaning.
OA-C
I think B is a case of redundancy.

From the beginning of the sentence, we are talking about two specific parties.
Both is not required as BOTH and EACH OTHER are redundant.

"each other" itself says that there are only two things.

B would be better if it were written as

the sides are intent on creating difficulties for each other........................Both is absolutely redundant.
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:31 am
FightWithGMAT wrote:
FINALCOUNTDOWN wrote:The complex tax dispute between the Covered Bridge Mall and Harris Township is not likely to be adjudicated for several years, and, in the meantime, both sides are intent on creating difficulties for the other.
(A) both sides are intent on creating difficulties for the other
(B) both sides are intent on creating difficulties for each other.
(C) each side is intent on creating difficulties for the other
(D) each side is intent on creating difficulties for one another
(E) the sides are both intent on creating difficulties for each other.

How does A ,B and D convey different meaning.
OA-C
I think B is a case of redundancy.

From the beginning of the sentence, we are talking about two specific parties.
Both is not required as BOTH and EACH OTHER are redundant.

"each other" itself says that there are only two things.

B would be better if it were written as

the sides are intent on creating difficulties for each other........................Both is absolutely redundant.
i agree with this evaluation. nicely done.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1