BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

bonus money

Expert replies
by maihuna » Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:15 am
The amount of bonus money that
managers take home has declined
through the 1990s, causing an exodus
of experienced financial services
advisors to a variety of nontraditional
industries. These industries, while
unable to offer competitive salaries and
bonuses, have been forced to find
creative methods of compensation for
productive managers.


Which of the following is an assumption underlying the information presented in the first paragraph of the passage?




There was no cause for the managerial exodus more significant than the decrease in bonus levels.

Nontraditional industries provide more comprehensive benefits than does the financial services industry.

The rise in profits at nontraditional industries is due to the influx of financial managers.

A longer tenure at a given company leads to greater managerial and experiential efficiencies.

Prior to 1990, bonus levels in the financial services industry were consistently rising.
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by gmatmachoman » Fri Oct 30, 2009 12:32 pm
[spoiler]E & A[/spoiler] seems tempting.. I go for [spoiler]E!!![/spoiler]
IMO E
Join the discussion

by pandeyvineet24 » Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:02 pm
I was between A and B. Picked A
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:13 pm
I would like to go with A.

E seems to be irrelevant to the argument. There is no information whether the bonus was constant or was it rising.
Join the discussion

by gmatv09 » Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:29 pm
By PoE ... IMO - A
Join the discussion

by crackgmat007 » Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:51 pm
Yeah...by POE only A seems plausible
Join the discussion

by 2010gmat » Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:56 pm
The amount of bonus money that
managers take home has declined
through the 1990s,

causing an exodus
of experienced financial services
advisors to a variety of nontraditional
industries

so if there is some other reason for the exodus then the argument falls apart...hence A
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sun Nov 01, 2009 12:24 am
Yeah.. A seems to be the right Pick
Join the discussion

A

by brick2009 » Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:06 pm
In assumoption problem, try the denial test.

A: IF there is another reason(stress @ work) , other than bonus for exodus of managers, then this whole argument falls apart.

This (finance) is the only reason why the exodus occurred.

Hence A correct.
Join the discussion