Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Boldface 2

Expert replies
by mgmt_gmat » Fri Feb 12, 2010 1:39 am
Ecologist: The Scottish Highlands were once the site of extensive forests, but these
forests have mostly disappeared and been replaced by peat bogs. The common view is
that the Highlands’ deforestation was caused by human activity, especially agriculture.
However, agriculture began in the Highlands less than 2,000 years ago
. Peat bogs,
which consist of compressed decayed vegetable matter, build up by only about one foot
per 1,000 years and, throughout the Highlands, remains of trees in peat bogs are
almost all at depths great than four feet.
Since climate changes that occurred between
7,000 and 4,000 years ago favored the development of peat bogs rather than the survival
of forests, the deforestation was more likely the result of natural processes than of human
activity.


In the ecologist’s argument the two portions in boldface play which of the following
roles?
A. The first is evidence that has been used in support of a position that the ecologist
rejects; the second is a finding that the ecologist uses to counter that evidence.
B. The first is evidence that, in light of the evidence provided in the second, serves
as grounds for the ecologist’s rejection of a certain position.
C. The first is a position that the ecologist rejects; the second is evidence that has
been used in support of that position.
39
D. The first is a position that the ecologist rejects; the second provides evidence in
support of that rejection.
E. The first is a position for which the ecologist argues; the second provides
evidence to support that position.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by komal » Fri Feb 12, 2010 2:22 am
Premise : The scottish highlands were once the site of extensive forests.
These forests have disappeared and replaced by peat bogs.
The common view is that deforestation was caused by human activity especially agriculture.

Counter premise : Boldface1 However agriculture began in the high lands less than 2000 years ago.
Peat Bogs build up only about one foot per 1000 years
Boldface 2 Remains of trees in these peat bogs are all at depths more than 4 feet.
climate changes occurred between 7000 and 4000 years ago.

Conclusion : Therefore deforestation was more likely the result of natural process (climate changes) than human activity (agriculture)


A. The first is evidence that has been used in support of a position that the ecologist rejects; the second is a finding that the ecologist uses to counter that evidence.
Incorrect : 'Finding' is not mentioned in the passage above. Hence Eliminated.

B. The first is evidence that, in light of the evidence provided in the second, serves as grounds for the ecologist’s rejection of a certain position.
Correct : The author tries to reject the position that deforestation was caused by human activity. He does that by providing counter premises Boldface 1 and Boldface 2.

C. The first is a position that the ecologist rejects; the second is evidence that has been used in support of that position.
Incorrect : The author certainly DOES NOT reject boldface 1. Eliminated.

D. The first is a position that the ecologist rejects; the second provides evidence in support of that rejection.
Incorrect : --------- Same as C ----------------

E. The first is a position for which the ecologist argues; the second provides evidence to support that position.
Incorrect : The author does not ARGUE boldface 1.
Join the discussion

by Nick0203 » Tue Jan 15, 2019 12:16 am
A. The ecologist rejects the common view about the Highlands' deforestation. The first claim supports main claim. After all, "however" indicates a change in direction.
B. Correct. First and second bold support main claim, "rejection of a certain position."
C. First bold face is not the position that the ecologist rejects.
D. First bold face is not the position that the ecologist rejects.
E. The first is not the ecologist's argument; it is evidence.
Join the discussion