BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Bold faced

Expert replies
by annakool1009 » Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:15 pm
The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city's transportation network. Most of the network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population. The subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient. If the city does not make changes soon to the network, it will see many of its prized industries relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city's financial health will be jeopardized.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?


The first is an explanation of a current state of affairs; the second is a prediction based on that state of affairs.


The first is a statement of fact in opposition to the author's conclusion; the second is that conclusion.


The first emphasizes an existing problem; the second offers a proposal to solve that problem.


The first is information the author suggests has been overlooked in the situation at hand; the second describes that situation.


The first is a justification of an impending problem; the second describes the consequences of that problem.
Gearing up for the D-day.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by canada_sms » Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:17 pm
I think you could narrow it down to A and E and possible contenders.

I think E is more correct however because the first statement is really justifying why there are problems with the network vs. explaining the current state of the network (suggested by answer choice A). Also the second boldface statement uses "it will" which means that the author is not predicting anything rather they know for a fact what the outcome will be.
Join the discussion

by pandeyvineet24 » Mon Jan 05, 2009 5:22 pm
Could narrow down to A,C,E.
The conclusion of the argument is "The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city's transportation network."

The first is an explanation of a current state of affairs; the second is a prediction based on that state of affairs.
1st bold statement is not a explanation of current state of affairs. Even though the 2nd stmt is a prediction on the state of affairs. Rule out A

The first is a statement of fact in opposition to the author's conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
1st statement if any supports the conclusion. 2nd bold statement is not a conclusion. Rule out B

The first emphasizes an existing problem; the second offers a proposal to solve that problem.
1st stmt explains the problem. 2nd does not offers a proposal to solve. It reflects the consequences. Rule out C

The first is information the author suggests has been overlooked in the situation at hand; the second describes that situation.
1st stmt. No information in the passage to suggest that the 1st stmt was overlooked. 2nd stmt describes the situation. Rule out D


the first statement explains the reasons of the problem.
Second statement describes the consequences of the problem.
and that is answer E

What is OA ?
Join the discussion

Re: Bold faced

by logitech » Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:51 pm
First one describes what caused the problem
Second one gives us what needs to be done and what happens if not
The first sentence is the conclusion: SHOULD INVEST MORE!

The first is an explanation of a current state of affairs; the second is a prediction based on that state of affairs.

It is not the current state


The first is a statement of fact in opposition to the author's conclusion; the second is that conclusion. wrong


The first emphasizes an existing problem; the second offers a proposal to solve that problem. Wrong ( it is the cause , not the problem )


The first is information the author suggests has been overlooked in the situation at hand; the second describes that situation.


The first is a justification of an impending( to be about to occur) problem; the second describes the consequences of that problem.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Mon Jan 05, 2009 9:28 pm
IMO: E

Following two come close:

The first is a statement of fact in opposition to the author's conclusion; the second is that conclusion.

Second is a conclusion, but first doesn't oppose that.

The first is a justification of an impending problem; the second describes the consequences of that problem.
Yes First seems to justify current issues, and second can be taken as consequence of that. As when plans were made the city was too small.
Join the discussion

by Bidisha800 » Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:11 pm
Argument didn't justify; it explained.

I'm with (A)

What is the probability of owner posting the OA ? my guess 0%
Drill baby drill !

GMATPowerPrep Test1= 740
GMATPowerPrep Test2= 760
Kaplan Diagnostic Test= 700
Kaplan Test1=600
Kalplan Test2=670
Kalplan Test3=570
Join the discussion

by Brad.C » Fri May 13, 2016 1:52 pm
A looks good
Join the discussion