BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

bold faced -- retail chain

Expert replies
by pappueshwar » Mon Feb 13, 2012 7:09 pm
hi All,
please explain the below problem and also let me know as to why B is NOT a good option.

OA : C

In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.

In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?


Choices
A.The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.
B. The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.
C.The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.
D.The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main argument's conclusion.
E.The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by avik.ch » Mon Feb 13, 2012 11:16 pm
In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. - an evidence, a trend in the customer behavior ( fact1)

Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth - (fact2)

it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, - main conclusion

because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place. - reason supporting the main conclusion .


We can see that the 2nd bold face is the reason presented for the main conclusion to stand out. - eliminate A,D and E.

What is the claim negated in the argument -- "that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false" - this is derived from fact1 and fact2 - the first bold face is the basis of this claim.
The first boldface is not the claim that is negated - its just a fact or an evidence. Eliminate B

Hope this helps !!
Join the discussion