BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Bold CR-2

Expert replies
by gmatblood » Sat Nov 05, 2011 1:22 pm
Policy analyst: Most government agencies become less effective over time. Some experts go so far as to recommend that every agency be eliminated after 10 years and created anew by replacing all of its existing personnel and revamping its bureaucratic structure. However, this policy would be impractical since certain government agencies perform vital functions, such as protecting national security, and therefore cannot afford even temporary upheaval.

In the policy analyst's argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A)The first is evidence offered in support of an opinion that the policy analyst rejects; the second offers information that contradicts that evidence.
(B)The first is a premise that the policy analyst accepts but argues against; the second offers evidence that supports the analyst's position.
(C)The first is a position that the policy analyst argues against; the second is the position that the analyst defends.
(D)The first is a generalization that the policy analyst accepts as accurate and is used as the basis for an opinion that the analyst rejects; the second is a consideration used to defend the analyst's position.
(E)The first is a generalization that the policy analyst accepts as accurate and is used as the basis for the analyst's position; the second offers another consideration used to defend that position.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by mir.yahya » Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:47 pm
IMO Option D

In my opinion, portion one is like a generalized notion provided by author which she accepts. I don't think it provides any evidence in favor of any arguments, hence Option A is incorrect. Also, author is not arguing against the notion that 'Most govt agencies become less effective', hence option B and C are also incorrect. Also portion one is not used as a basis for analyst's position. Option D, however, IMO is the right answer.
Join the discussion

by tuanquang269 » Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:20 am
IMO D

The first is the a controversial issue that raise opinions from two side. (So, we can eliminate [spoiler]A, B, and C)[/spoiler]. One side said that agencies should be eliminated. Another side (boldface) raise against the opinion in the first side. Between D and E. D said that the boldface is used as the basis for an opinion that the analyst rejects => the first side of argument. That is correct. So, why I choose D is my correct answer

[/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by scholardream » Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:55 pm
I go for D.
From the question, I know that the policy analyst accepts NOT goes against the arguement: Most government agencies become less effective over time.
He goes against the latter opinion on elimination of 10-year-serving agency. And the second bold phrase is the evidence for his opinion.
Join the discussion

by sownthar » Sun May 13, 2012 7:36 pm
Is OA for this question.. D? Pls confirm
Hope is a good thing, May be the best of things!!!
Join the discussion

by Gaurav 2013-fall » Thu May 17, 2012 2:17 am
D and E were close . But finally D wins.
Join the discussion