BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Bold CR-2

Expert replies
by gmatblood » Sat Nov 05, 2011 1:22 pm
Policy analyst: Most government agencies become less effective over time. Some experts go so far as to recommend that every agency be eliminated after 10 years and created anew by replacing all of its existing personnel and revamping its bureaucratic structure. However, this policy would be impractical since certain government agencies perform vital functions, such as protecting national security, and therefore cannot afford even temporary upheaval.

In the policy analyst's argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A)The first is evidence offered in support of an opinion that the policy analyst rejects; the second offers information that contradicts that evidence.
(B)The first is a premise that the policy analyst accepts but argues against; the second offers evidence that supports the analyst's position.
(C)The first is a position that the policy analyst argues against; the second is the position that the analyst defends.
(D)The first is a generalization that the policy analyst accepts as accurate and is used as the basis for an opinion that the analyst rejects; the second is a consideration used to defend the analyst's position.
(E)The first is a generalization that the policy analyst accepts as accurate and is used as the basis for the analyst's position; the second offers another consideration used to defend that position.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by mir.yahya » Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:47 pm
IMO Option D

In my opinion, portion one is like a generalized notion provided by author which she accepts. I don't think it provides any evidence in favor of any arguments, hence Option A is incorrect. Also, author is not arguing against the notion that 'Most govt agencies become less effective', hence option B and C are also incorrect. Also portion one is not used as a basis for analyst's position. Option D, however, IMO is the right answer.
Join the discussion

by tuanquang269 » Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:20 am
IMO D

The first is the a controversial issue that raise opinions from two side. (So, we can eliminate [spoiler]A, B, and C)[/spoiler]. One side said that agencies should be eliminated. Another side (boldface) raise against the opinion in the first side. Between D and E. D said that the boldface is used as the basis for an opinion that the analyst rejects => the first side of argument. That is correct. So, why I choose D is my correct answer

[/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by scholardream » Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:55 pm
I go for D.
From the question, I know that the policy analyst accepts NOT goes against the arguement: Most government agencies become less effective over time.
He goes against the latter opinion on elimination of 10-year-serving agency. And the second bold phrase is the evidence for his opinion.
Join the discussion

by sownthar » Sun May 13, 2012 7:36 pm
Is OA for this question.. D? Pls confirm
Hope is a good thing, May be the best of things!!!
Join the discussion

by Gaurav 2013-fall » Thu May 17, 2012 2:17 am
D and E were close . But finally D wins.
Join the discussion