BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Bob and Wendy walk to restaurant

Expert replies
by hk » Sun Apr 19, 2009 7:08 pm
I got this question from MGMAT cat. I'm not satisfied with their method of solving as it could take more than 2 mins. Can anybody point out a logical way of solving such questions quickly?

Bob and Wendy planned to walk from their home to a restaurant for dinner together. However, Bob was delayed at work, and Wendy left for the restaurant before Bob did. If the restaurant is 3 miles from their home and Bob left for the restaurant a half-hour after Wendy did, how long did Wendy have to wait for Bob at the restaurant?

(1) Wendy walked at a constant pace of 4 miles per hour

(2) Bob walked at a constant pace of 1 mile per hour faster than Wendy.


OA after some discussion.
Wanna know what I'm upto? Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/harikrish
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Feep » Sun Apr 19, 2009 7:53 pm
Well, the question gives us the "head-start" time (fairly irrelevant) and the distance away, 3 miles.

(1) gives a specific rate for Wendy, but Bob could race there like an Olympic sprinter or take his sweet old time. Who knows how long she could be waiting? Insufficient.

(2) gives a statement that puts their relative velocities into perspective. If you're unsure about the mathematics behind this stuff, as many are, just go ahead and plug in some numbers and see what you get. 3 miles away, 3 mph seems like a good number:

Bob = 3 mph, Wendy = 2 mph, Bob's Trip = 1 hour, Wendy's Trip = 90 minutes, so they actually arrive at the same time. No wait.

Bob = 4 mph, Wendy = 3 mph, Bob's Trip = 45 min, Wendy's Trip = 60 min, so Wendy has to wait 15 minutes.

This is all the information given, and so (2) is insufficient.

Together, however, we have definite speeds for each party. Sufficient.

C.
I tutor GMAT/GRE level mathematics privately in the Los Angeles region, as well as via Skype for a discounted rate. Send me a message if you're interested.
Join the discussion

by hk » Sun Apr 19, 2009 7:58 pm
thanks a lot feep..

I actually followed the same procedure but my mistake was that i use the values 4 and 3 for their speed and since i could find the wait time i presumed that this is sufficient (statement 2). Now i have learnt that i should always substitute 2 sets of values, always!!!

thanks again..
Wanna know what I'm upto? Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/harikrish
Join the discussion