BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

blackbirds stop - pls comment and answer

Expert replies
by ranell » Sun Jun 28, 2009 2:55 pm
Each year red-winged blackbirds stop in a certain region of Midland Province on their spring and fall migrations. In the fall, they eat a significant portion of the province’s sunflower crop. This year Midland farmers sought permits to set out small amounts of poisoned rice during the blackbirds’ spring stop in order to reduce the fall blackbird population. Some residents voiced concern that the rice could threaten certain species of rare migratory birds. Nevertheless, the wildlife agency approved the permits.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to justify the wildlife agency’s approval of the permits, given the concerns voiced by some residents?
A. In the region where the red-winged blackbirds stop, they are the first birds to be present in the spring.
B. The poison that farmers want to use does not kill birds but rather makes them incapable of producing viable eggs.
C. Since rice is not raised in Midland Province, few species of birds native to the province normally eat rice.
D. Without the permit, any farmers shown to have set out poison for the blackbirds would be heavily fined.
E. The poison that farmers got approval to use has no taste or smell that would make it detectable by birds.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by mehravikas » Sun Jun 28, 2009 5:42 pm
Is it B?

B is the only option that explains why wildlife experts allowed farmers to use poison, given concerns of the residents.
Join the discussion

by raghavsarathy » Sun Jun 28, 2009 5:53 pm
IMO - A

Since the farmers keep "small" amounts of poisoned rice , if the red-winged blackbirds are the first species then they would eat the rice and by the time the other birds arrive , there would be no poisoned rice remaining. Hence the other migratory birds would be safe.

OA ??
Join the discussion

ranell wrote:Each year red-winged blackbirds stop in a certain region of Midland Province on their spring and fall migrations. In the fall, they eat a significant portion of the province’s sunflower crop. This year Midland farmers sought permits to set out small amounts of poisoned rice during the blackbirds’ spring stop in order to reduce the fall blackbird population. Some residents voiced concern that the rice could threaten certain species of rare migratory birds. Nevertheless, the wildlife agency approved the permits.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to justify the wildlife agency’s approval of the permits, given the concerns voiced by some residents?
A. In the region where the red-winged blackbirds stop, they are the first birds to be present in the spring.
B. The poison that farmers want to use does not kill birds but rather makes them incapable of producing viable eggs.
C. Since rice is not raised in Midland Province, few species of birds native to the province normally eat rice.
D. Without the permit, any farmers shown to have set out poison for the blackbirds would be heavily fined.
E. The poison that farmers got approval to use has no taste or smell that would make it detectable by birds.
IMO B
>> In the fall, they eat a significant portion of the province’s sunflower crop.
if the poison makes the birds incapable of producing viable eggs then the population of bird will decrease in fall
Join the discussion

shilpi84 wrote:
ranell wrote:Each year red-winged blackbirds stop in a certain region of Midland Province on their spring and fall migrations. In the fall, they eat a significant portion of the province’s sunflower crop. This year Midland farmers sought permits to set out small amounts of poisoned rice during the blackbirds’ spring stop in order to reduce the fall blackbird population. Some residents voiced concern that the rice could threaten certain species of rare migratory birds. Nevertheless, the wildlife agency approved the permits.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to justify the wildlife agency’s approval of the permits, given the concerns voiced by some residents?
A. In the region where the red-winged blackbirds stop, they are the first birds to be present in the spring.
B. The poison that farmers want to use does not kill birds but rather makes them incapable of producing viable eggs.
C. Since rice is not raised in Midland Province, few species of birds native to the province normally eat rice.
D. Without the permit, any farmers shown to have set out poison for the blackbirds would be heavily fined.
E. The poison that farmers got approval to use has no taste or smell that would make it detectable by birds.
IMO B
>> In the fall, they eat a significant portion of the province’s sunflower crop.
if the poison makes the birds incapable of producing viable eggs then the population of bird will decrease in fall
if poison makes birds incapable of producing viable eggs, there is a threat for 'rare' migratory birds of not reproducing if these birds also feed on the rice. On the other hand, if harmful birds are the first ones to migrate, it would be justifiable to kill them using 'small' quantities of rice. A IMO. OA?
Join the discussion

by garganup » Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:10 pm
IMO C because it is mentioned that many spices will be in endangered according to some resident but this option mention that few spice will eat that.
Join the discussion

by madhur_ahuja » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:09 pm
raghavsarathy wrote:IMO - A

Since the farmers keep "small" amounts of poisoned rice , if the red-winged blackbirds are the first species then they would eat the rice and by the time the other birds arrive , there would be no poisoned rice remaining. Hence the other migratory birds would be safe.

OA ??
I too agree with above explanation. Go with A
Join the discussion

by gmat_dest » Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:13 am
A after eliminating others.

B not true because by affecting the capability for viable eggs , the plan might be threatening rare species.

As for the OA, I did a BTG lookup and A is indeed correct.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-cr-t10329.html
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:26 am
In this question can some one please tell me why are assuming that

certain migratory birds does not include red winged black birds....

Is it not possible that residents might have complained about the extinction of the red-winged birds ?

I am a bit confused...can someone please explain ?
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Tue Jul 07, 2009 3:25 am
In this question can some one please tell me why are assuming that

certain migratory birds does not include red winged black birds....

Is it not possible that residents might have complained about the extinction of the red-winged birds ?

I am a bit confused...can someone please explain ?
Residents are complaining for the other migratory birds which also come along with red-winged birds.

red-winged birds are the cause of trouble and residents did not raised any concern for red-winged birds. It is very important to read closely.

Hope this helps
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Tue Jul 07, 2009 6:20 am
Pessage mentions:

"certain species of rare migratory birds"....

how can we assume that it does not include the red winged birds. Nowhere it is mentioned "other"....

Please help me undertand the same....
Join the discussion

by khanshainur » Sun May 15, 2016 11:54 pm
My intuition whispers that it is A
Join the discussion

by Eric77Gorm » Sun May 15, 2016 11:58 pm
I'm going with A.
Join the discussion