BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Biz productivity

Expert replies
by avenus » Thu May 28, 2009 10:40 am
Economist: Every business strives to increase its productivity, for this increases profits for the owners and the likelihood that the business will survive. But not all efforts to increase productivity are beneficial to the business as a whole. Often, attempts to increase productivity decrease the number of employees, which clearly harms the dismissed employees as well as the sense of security of the retained employees.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the economist’s argument?

(A) If an action taken to secure the survival of a business fails to enhance the welfare of the business’s employees, that action cannot be good for the business as a whole.
(B) Some measures taken by a business to increase productivity fail to be beneficial to the business as a whole.
(C) Only if the employees of a business are also its owners will the interests of the employees and owners coincide, enabling measures that will be beneficial to the business as a whole.
(D) There is no business that does not make efforts to increase its productivity.
(E) Decreasing the number of employees in a business undermines the sense of security of retained employees
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Re: Biz productivity

by ankit1383 » Thu May 28, 2009 4:28 pm
IMO.....B
Join the discussion

by rahulg83 » Thu May 28, 2009 6:54 pm
[spoiler]B IMO
A,C and D are extreme.
Although E is what argument says, this is not the author's main point[/spoiler]
Join the discussion

Re: Biz productivity

by amazonviper » Thu May 28, 2009 7:03 pm
avenus wrote:Economist: Every business strives to increase its productivity, for this increases profits for the owners and the likelihood that the business will survive. But not all efforts to increase productivity are beneficial to the business as a whole. Often, attempts to increase productivity decrease the number of employees, which clearly harms the dismissed employees as well as the sense of security of the retained employees.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the economist’s argument?

(A) If an action taken to secure the survival of a business fails to enhance the welfare of the business’s employees, that action cannot be good for the business as a whole.
(B) Some measures taken by a business to increase productivity fail to be beneficial to the business as a whole.
(C) Only if the employees of a business are also its owners will the interests of the employees and owners coincide, enabling measures that will be beneficial to the business as a whole.
(D) There is no business that does not make efforts to increase its productivity.
(E) Decreasing the number of employees in a business undermines the sense of security of retained employees

IMO B. Please let us know the OA.
Join the discussion

by avenus » Fri May 29, 2009 8:26 am
well done gents (ladies??)

OA is B
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Sat May 30, 2009 3:41 am
I picked (A) and then realized the mistake.

'most accurately expresses'
Join the discussion

by nicolette » Sun May 15, 2016 2:53 pm
I am leaning more towards B, but I'm not sure about it
Join the discussion