BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Bird Population

Expert replies
by rahulg83 » Sun May 24, 2009 8:14 am
In a polluted area around the Great Lakes, scientists studying bird populations have observed a drop in the number of both herring gulls and terns. Both bird species prey on the same type of fish, whose numbers are also being negatively affected by pollution. However, the tern population has seen a much sharper decrease than the herring gull population. Scientists have concluded that the herring gulls have a higher survival rate because they are able to find alternative sources of food, including garbage dumps along the shoreline.

Which of the following, if true, would provide the best piece of evidence in support of the researchers’ conclusion?


* A survey shows that bird populations in areas around the Great Lakes have shown similar decreases.
* A related study finds that fish populations in the Great Lakes are affected as much by other predators as by pollution.
* Maps of the area reveal that the largest garbage dump in the area is located 3 miles inland from the lake.
* Blood tests performed on the gulls reveal high levels of the types of fatty acids generally found only in human food.
* Analysis of water in the area where the birds nest reveals that toxin levels are actually slightly below fish tolerance levels.

OA D
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by vcgmat » Sun May 24, 2009 3:12 pm
Agree with D ...

Becoz, if the blood samples show that gulls have high levels of fatty acids as found in humans ==> gulls have been feeding on garbage dumps...
Join the discussion

by rahulg83 » Mon May 25, 2009 3:37 am
Aren't we assuming big time here that garbage mentioned in the passage has such kind of human food waste that this herring gulls feed upon?
Maps of the area reveal that the largest garbage dump in the area is located 3 miles inland from the lake
Could this be the better option. If largest garbage dump is 3 mile inside (distance doesn't matter anyways), then maybe these herring gulls thrived upon this dump only..
Join the discussion

by Musicolo » Mon May 25, 2009 7:34 am
I was going for either C or D but I went for D because it mentiones "acids found in human food" which obviously gulls fed upon as opposed to C which just mentiones "garbage dump" which could consist of anything and not food which gulls fed upon.
Join the discussion

by Domnu » Thu May 28, 2009 6:13 am
I would side with D as well... the garbage dump being 3 miles away doesn't really offer an answer, since we aren't aware of how far gulls go in order to feed. If blood tests showed that foods that humans eat were in the gulls' systems, then eating from the garbage is strongly inferable.
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
Join the discussion

by hmboy17 » Thu May 28, 2009 10:04 am
My answer would be D as the fight is between C and D. C is acutally the same premise mentioned in question so I will not choose it, we should find some thing else that can support the conclusion.
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Sat May 30, 2009 3:39 am
alternative sources of food

(D)

+

I think 3 miles is quite a distance. Hence, it reduces the chances for (C) to be the answer.
Join the discussion

by kanha81 » Sat May 30, 2009 6:42 am
hmboy17 wrote:My answer would be D as the fight is between C and D. C is acutally the same premise mentioned in question so I will not choose it, we should find some thing else that can support the conclusion.
This makes sense! Looking for something extra that can strengthen the conclusion besides what's stated in the premise.

I was torn between [spoiler][C][/spoiler] and [spoiler][D][/spoiler], chose [spoiler][C][/spoiler], but your reasoning makes sense.
Want to Beat GMAT.
Always do what you're afraid to do. Whoooop GMAT
Join the discussion

by sudeep_ar » Sat May 30, 2009 9:58 am
I will not go for any option in general, but only option D gives some special attribute to gull, so as to distinguish between gull and terns.
Hence [d]
Join the discussion

by nicolette » Sun May 15, 2016 2:52 pm
I'm going with D
Join the discussion