BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

BHARATI

Expert replies
by arorag » Thu Jun 19, 2008 8:47 am
Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has lived in England and Canada, and first came to the United States in 1961 to study at the Iowa Writers’ Workshop.

(A) Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has
(B) Having been a United States citizen since 1988, she was born in Calcutta in 1940; author Bharati Mukherjee
(C) Born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee became a United States citizen in 1988; she has
(D) Being born in Calcutta in 1940 and having been a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee
(E) Having been born in Calcutta in 1940 and being a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee

What is wrong with B. If we has lived doesn't it mean that she is still living
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by punit.kaur.mba » Thu Jun 19, 2008 8:58 am
Join the discussion

by sulabh » Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:15 am
B suggests that she had been a citizen of US before she was born !!!!
Join the discussion

by lvincy » Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:17 am
I will go for C.
Has lived is present prefect but can be used for past event when exact time is not known.
In this example she lived in England and Calcutta during 1940 to 1961 but it is not known for how long.So here "has lived "is correct.

Arorag what is OA?
Join the discussion

by punit.kaur.mba » Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:24 am
Ya, I also thought C was the best option.
Join the discussion

by g_beatthegmat » Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:59 am
(C) is the best option here.

There are couple of problems in option (B) - look closely to what "having been" is referring to -
Having been a United States citizen since 1988, she was born in Calcutta in 1940
notice that I've removed the text after ';'. That's because, any sentence before or after a semi-color ';' should make complete sense.. sentences before and after the semi-colon can be interdependent alright, but have to make complete sense without each other too.

So the quote above doesn't refer to any definite person, only refers to some "she". Who is this "she" isn't clear.
Join the discussion

by varunrajwade » Fri Jun 20, 2008 7:36 am
I too selected C initially, but I am confused about the semicolon.. What does it signify? And how does sentence flow work with it?
Join the discussion

by punit.kaur.mba » Fri Jun 20, 2008 11:19 am
a semicolon suggests two independent clauses and hence should make sense irrespective of the fact that the other is present. So, a pronoun in one of the independent clauses cannot refer to a subject or object in the other independent clause.
Join the discussion

by ildude02 » Fri Jun 20, 2008 5:21 pm
If this holds true, then the independent clause in C after ; begins with "she" as well and it doesn't have a noun to refer too for that particular clause. I don't think having a SHE without the reference makes it non-independent. At least, that's my thinking'not sure if anyone wants to weight on this thought
punit.kaur.mba wrote:a semicolon suggests two independent clauses and hence should make sense irrespective of the fact that the other is present. So, a pronoun in one of the independent clauses cannot refer to a subject or object in the other independent clause.
Join the discussion

by shipra » Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:28 am
can sum1 pl stell em ewhats wrong with option D?
Join the discussion

by punit.kaur.mba » Mon Jun 23, 2008 6:01 am
Shipra,

As far as I know... we should try to avoid sentences that have "being" in them.

I eliminate them right away and look at such choices at the end only if others don't seem correct.
Join the discussion

by anubhavmehrotra » Mon Jun 23, 2008 7:09 am
Would have to go with (C) ... (A) and (B) can bee right away eliminated, and even (D) is awkward... between (C) and (E), C seems the most concise, and well worded. Also people... the only answer choice not having the word 'being' ... a straight no no for the GMAT !!

Cheers :)
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1