BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

BHARATI

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 343
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:28 pm
Thanked: 4 times
by arorag » Thu Jun 19, 2008 8:47 am
Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has lived in England and Canada, and first came to the United States in 1961 to study at the Iowa Writers’ Workshop.

(A) Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has
(B) Having been a United States citizen since 1988, she was born in Calcutta in 1940; author Bharati Mukherjee
(C) Born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee became a United States citizen in 1988; she has
(D) Being born in Calcutta in 1940 and having been a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee
(E) Having been born in Calcutta in 1940 and being a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee

What is wrong with B. If we has lived doesn't it mean that she is still living
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 104
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:44 pm
Thanked: 8 times

by punit.kaur.mba » Thu Jun 19, 2008 8:58 am
Whats the OA?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 2:29 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:750

by sulabh » Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:15 am
B suggests that she had been a citizen of US before she was born !!!!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 60
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:38 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by lvincy » Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:17 am
I will go for C.
Has lived is present prefect but can be used for past event when exact time is not known.
In this example she lived in England and Calcutta during 1940 to 1961 but it is not known for how long.So here "has lived "is correct.

Arorag what is OA?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 104
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:44 pm
Thanked: 8 times

by punit.kaur.mba » Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:24 am
Ya, I also thought C was the best option.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 100
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:36 pm
Thanked: 6 times

by g_beatthegmat » Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:59 am
(C) is the best option here.

There are couple of problems in option (B) - look closely to what "having been" is referring to -
Having been a United States citizen since 1988, she was born in Calcutta in 1940
notice that I've removed the text after ';'. That's because, any sentence before or after a semi-color ';' should make complete sense.. sentences before and after the semi-colon can be interdependent alright, but have to make complete sense without each other too.

So the quote above doesn't refer to any definite person, only refers to some "she". Who is this "she" isn't clear.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 7:33 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by varunrajwade » Fri Jun 20, 2008 7:36 am
I too selected C initially, but I am confused about the semicolon.. What does it signify? And how does sentence flow work with it?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 104
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:44 pm
Thanked: 8 times

by punit.kaur.mba » Fri Jun 20, 2008 11:19 am
a semicolon suggests two independent clauses and hence should make sense irrespective of the fact that the other is present. So, a pronoun in one of the independent clauses cannot refer to a subject or object in the other independent clause.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 320
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:00 pm
Thanked: 10 times

by ildude02 » Fri Jun 20, 2008 5:21 pm
If this holds true, then the independent clause in C after ; begins with "she" as well and it doesn't have a noun to refer too for that particular clause. I don't think having a SHE without the reference makes it non-independent. At least, that's my thinking'not sure if anyone wants to weight on this thought
punit.kaur.mba wrote:a semicolon suggests two independent clauses and hence should make sense irrespective of the fact that the other is present. So, a pronoun in one of the independent clauses cannot refer to a subject or object in the other independent clause.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 11:23 pm
Location: Dubai
Thanked: 6 times

by shipra » Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:28 am
can sum1 pl stell em ewhats wrong with option D?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 104
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:44 pm
Thanked: 8 times

by punit.kaur.mba » Mon Jun 23, 2008 6:01 am
Shipra,

As far as I know... we should try to avoid sentences that have "being" in them.

I eliminate them right away and look at such choices at the end only if others don't seem correct.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 12:29 am

by anubhavmehrotra » Mon Jun 23, 2008 7:09 am
Would have to go with (C) ... (A) and (B) can bee right away eliminated, and even (D) is awkward... between (C) and (E), C seems the most concise, and well worded. Also people... the only answer choice not having the word 'being' ... a straight no no for the GMAT !!

Cheers :)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1