Nina1987 wrote:Hi,

I am planning to write the GMAT soon. However, before the exam, I would like to review about 500-600 questions I've marked out of almost 2500 official questions. What's the best way to review all these questions? I don't have enough time to solve these questions again. Thanks

It's tough to answer this question in the abstract, but one approach some students find helpful when reviewing a large batch of questions is to focus on pattern recognition rather than re-solving every question. In other words, each time you see a problem, you'll mentally consider what approach would work best (algebra? picking numbers? back-solving? chart?) If you're comfortable that your approach is a good one, keep moving. If you're not sure, then dig in and redo the question. The hope is that you'll be able to flip through 80% of the questions fairly quickly, leaving you 100 questions or so to resolve, a more reasonable amount of work considering your timeframe.

Thanks for your reply @DavidG@VeritasPrep. That looks like a good strategy. But what do you mean by 'It's tough to answer this question in the abstract" What more information do you need? I am specifically talking about quant questions. I am trying to improve from 49 to 51 on quant. I need Q50/51 as I am targeting financial engineering programs. Thanks

Nina1987 wrote:Thanks for your reply @DavidG@VeritasPrep. That looks like a good strategy. But what do you mean by 'It's tough to answer this question in the abstract" What more information do you need? I am specifically talking about quant questions. I am trying to improve from 49 to 51 on quant. I need Q50/51 as I am targeting financial engineering programs. Thanks

I just mean that different students require different approaches to crafting study plans. I recently had one student who was shooting for 780, and she could solve problems incredibly quickly. So quickly, that she could probably have ripped through 500 questions a day without breaking a sweat - it was often enough for her to eyeball a problem and recognize that she knew how to do it. However, another student was struggling a bit, and if I'd suggested more than 10-15 questions a day, he'd have been overwhelmed. Rather, we had to really dissect a handful of questions and then do some drilling to build up his fundamentals. It sounds as though you're closer to the former student than the latter, but the point of my post was to try to offer abstract parameters for finding that balance between quick review and thorough dissection, rather than offering prescriptive concrete advice, such as "do 125 questions a day.'