BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

behavioral

Expert replies
by nauman » Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:34 pm
Only an expert in some branch of psychology could understand why Patrick is behaving irrationally. But no expert is certain of being able to solve someone else’s problem. Patrick wants to devise a solution to his own behavioral problem.
Which one of the following conclusions can be validly drawn from the passage?
(A) Patrick does not understand why he is behaving in this way.
(B) Patrick is not an expert in psychology.
(C) Patrick is not certain of being able to devise a solution to his own behavioral problem.
(D) Unless Charles is an expert in some branch of psychology, Charles should not offer a solution to Patrick’s behavioral problem.
(E) If Charles is certain of being able to solve Patrick’s behavioral problem, then Charles does not understand why Patrick is behaving in this way.

I am very confused to see this answer, could somebody explain this.

Thanks in advance
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by torontogmat.com » Thu Mar 13, 2008 9:08 pm
(B) there is nothing to say that Patrick is not an expert in psychology.

(A) Patrick does not understand why he is behaving in this way --> Only experts can understand, but we don't know whether Patrick is an expert.

(C) there is nothing to say that Patrick is not certain of being able to devise a solution to his own behavioral problem. Only experts can not be certain, and we don't know whether Patrick is an expert.

(D) It says only experts can understand, but they can't be sure about a solution. It says nothing about the potential efficacy of non-experts' solutions.

---

(E) If Charles is certain of being able to solve Patrick’s behavioral problem (therefore not an expert), then Charles does not understand why Patrick is behaving in this way (true, since only experts understand).

is that right?
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Thu Mar 20, 2008 12:18 am
torontogmat.com wrote:(B) there is nothing to say that Patrick is not an expert in psychology.

(A) Patrick does not understand why he is behaving in this way --> Only experts can understand, but we don't know whether Patrick is an expert.

(C) there is nothing to say that Patrick is not certain of being able to devise a solution to his own behavioral problem. Only experts can not be certain, and we don't know whether Patrick is an expert.

(D) It says only experts can understand, but they can't be sure about a solution. It says nothing about the potential efficacy of non-experts' solutions.

---

(E) If Charles is certain of being able to solve Patrick’s behavioral problem (therefore not an expert), then Charles does not understand why Patrick is behaving in this way (true, since only experts understand).

is that right?
that's right. i really can't improve upon this solution, so i won't try.

i'm curious as to where this question came from - the LSAT perhaps? it doesn't much look like a real GMAT problem.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by nicolette » Fri May 13, 2016 12:58 am
I am leaning more towards A, but I'm not sure about it.
Join the discussion