Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been required to pass a comprehensive proficiency exam before the

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Mon Mar 20, 2023 2:24 pm
Timer
00:00
Your answer
Difficulty–

right wrong

Pick an answer to see how members did

Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been required to pass a comprehensive proficiency exam before they are allowed to graduate. The exam requirement was intended to ensure that a minimum level of academic quality will be achieved by the students in the state. In 1997, 20 percent of the seniors did not pass the exam and were, therefore, not allowed to graduate. In 1998, the number of seniors who passed the exam decreased by 10% from the previous year.

The argument above, if true, LEAST supports which of the following statement.


A. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam increased from 1997 to 1998 , the number of high schools seniors decreased during that time period.

B. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam decreased from 1997 to 1998 , the number of high schools seniors increased during that time period.

C. Unless the number of high school seniors was lower in 1998 than in 1997, the number of seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was lower than 80 percent.

D. If the number of high school seniors who did not pass the exam decreased by more than 10 percent from 1997 to 1998, the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was greater than 80 percent.

E. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was less than 70 percent, the number of high school seniors in 1997 was higher than the number in 1998.


OA E

Source: Princeton Review
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

The argument given in the passage indicates that a proficiency exam was introduced in State Q in 1997, which students had to pass before they could graduate. It is said that 20% of seniors failed to pass the exam in 1997, and in 1998, there was a 10% decrease in the number of seniors who passed the exam. We need to determine the statement that is least supported by this argument.

Option A: This statement is not supported by the given argument. There is no information about the number of high school seniors in 1997 or 1998.

Option B: This statement is also not supported by the given argument. Again, there is no information about the number of high school seniors in 1997 or 1998.

Option C: This statement is a reasonable inference based on the information provided in the passage. If the number of high school seniors who passed the exam decreased by 10% from 1997 to 1998, then the number of seniors who passed the exam in 1998 would be less than 80% of the total number of seniors. However, this statement is not supported by the given argument because there is no information about the number of seniors who took the exam in 1998.

Option D: This statement is a reasonable inference based on the given argument. If the number of seniors who did not pass the exam decreased by more than 10% from 1997 to 1998, then the percentage of seniors who passed the exam in 1998 would be greater than 80%. However, this statement is not directly supported by the given argument because we do not know the number of seniors who did not pass the exam in 1998.

Option E: This statement is not supported by the given argument. There is no information about the number of high school seniors in 1997 or 1998, and therefore we cannot infer whether a decrease in the percentage of seniors who passed the exam would be correlated with a decrease in the number of seniors.

Therefore, the statement that is least supported by the argument is option A.
Join the discussion