BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

beer and bread

Expert replies
by maihuna » Sun Dec 20, 2009 11:45 am
The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease. The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil. This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread. Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?
A. The tetracycline deposits did not form after the bodies were buried.
B. The diseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians were exposed would not be affected by tetracycline.
C. Typhus is generally fatal.
D. Nubian grain became contaminated with tetracycline-producing bacteria prior to being harvested.
E. Bread and beer were the only foods eaten by the ancient Nubians which could have contained tetracycline.
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by pandeyvineet24 » Sun Dec 20, 2009 12:00 pm
IMO A. If tetracycline deposits formed after the bodies were buried, then tetracycline from food is not the reason for the low incidence of typhus.
Join the discussion

by papgust » Sun Dec 20, 2009 11:42 pm
Agree with pandey's explanation. A should be the answer.
Join the discussion

by nervesofsteel » Mon Dec 21, 2009 2:54 am
A for me too...

if tetracycline can be formed after the bodies are buried..
then food may not be the source of tetracycline...
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Mon Dec 21, 2009 3:19 am
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:40 am
gmatmachoman wrote:IMO A...
Yes let it be A.

Situation: Typhus refers to a group of infectious diseases that are caused by rickettsial organisms and that result in an acute febrile. Tough Nubians inhabited in area where typhus was common, they were not affected from the disease, as per skelton examination. Since some antibotic has been found on their body, it is plausible to assume because of this antibodies they were not affected by typhus diseases.

If the antibodies were deposited after their death then it doesn't make the argument valid, so this should be the assumption. Done A
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 10:26 pm
In my opinion A is the most logical one.
Join the discussion