shovan85 wrote:During her presidency of the short-lived Woman's State Temperance Society (1852-1853), Elizabeth Cady Stanton, as she was a staunch advocate of liberalized divorce laws, scandalized many of her most ardent supporters in her suggestion that drunkenness should be made sufficient cause for divorce.
A. as she was a staunch advocate of liberalized divorce laws, scandalized many of her most ardent supporters in her suggestion that drunkenness should be
B. as she was a staunch advocate for liberalized divorce laws, scandalized many of her most ardent supporters by her suggestion of drunkenness being
C. in being a staunch advocate for liberalized divorce laws, had scandalized many of her most ardent supporters with the suggestion of drunkenness being
D. a staunch advocate of liberalized divorce laws, scandalized many of her most ardent supporters by suggesting that drunkenness be
E. a staunch advocate of liberalized divorce laws, she scandalized many of her most ardent supporters in suggesting that drunkenness should be
The issues:
1.
NOUN+ COMMA+ NOUN
--> In this case the NOUN after COMMA modifies the NOUN before COMMA.
---> The NOUN that modifies the NOUN before COMMA is synonymous to the NOUN modified.
Example:
Mr. Amartya Sen,
an economist, has won the novel in economics.
We don't say: Mr. Amartya Sen,
as he is an economist, has won the novel in economics.
Learning:
We don't use a clause in the modifier, rather we use NOUN in this case.
==> This kills the options A, B, and C.
2. See the following sentence:
Mr. Amartya Sen, an economist, has won the novel in economics.--> Correct.
Mr. Amartya Sen, an economist, he has won the novel in economics.---> INCORRECT because the subject of the verb "has won" is Amartya Sen, but "he" has been used again to refer to Amartya Sen.
The sentence then read as:
Mr. Amartya Sen he has the won novel in economics.
---> This kills the option E.
Answer is D.