BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

basic issue on pronoun issue

Expert replies
by rojans » Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:51 am
Hi all,



This doubt is regarding Pronoun Reference:

We know that a pronoun has to refer to ONE & ONLY ONE antecedent and any ambiguity in this regard means a wrong answer.
For eg :
Josie plays with Tina daily so that she remains fit ---
This is wrong because "She" seems to be referring to the closest noun Tina whereas it can refer to both of them. This is understood.

In this ex., both the subjects could be logically used to replace "She". But what if the former noun cannot be LOGICALLY used ?!?!


For ex :
Workers manufacture cars so that they can earn money.
Now here the closest noun to "they" is "cars" but we know "cars" CANNOT make "money". So "they" has to logically refer to "workers" only. So in this case, is this choice correct or is it still ambiguos !!?!

What if the sentence was:
Cars are manufactured by workers so that they can make more money.
(Please ignore the passiveness of the sentence)
Here the closest noun is "Workers" and "they" is logically referring to it too. But technically, since "cars" and "workers" are both plural, it can refer to both of them. In this case, is this also ambiguos or is the answer correctly framed !!?!?

Lastly: What if the sentence was:
Each car is manufactured by workers so that they can make money.
Now here, "car" is singular while "workers" are plural. Now since "they" is plural .... Does this automatically mean that "they" refers to "workers".
What if the nouns were flipped to say:
Workers manufacture a car so that they can make money.
Here, here, "car" is singular while "workers" are plural. So even though "they" is plural, it is closest to "car" .... Does this make the choice wrong or will here too the sentence automatically mean that "they" refers to "workers".

Would really appreciate a quick response ..... Thanks a lot in advance .....

If any of the expert instructors here such as Ron & Stacey have already answered a similiar query, then i would be obiliged if someone could pl give me the link. I have tried to find it but in this vast ocean of topics, haven't been successful!!!
.....The original person was someone else,He posted this on Manhattan fourm,But he didn't get answer so do I.
Please demigods answer this question seriously On time too........
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Jim@StratusPrep » Mon Mar 05, 2012 11:18 am
You are right with your statement that 1 pronoun must relate to 1 noun. Even despite logical reasoning, workers and cars in the same sentence cannot have a 'they.' Even though cars do not make money, in theory it creates confusion. What if the cars were appreciating in value? The other examples where you switching to a singular car, you can use they because it refers to the workers.

Hope this helps.
GMAT Answers provides a world class adaptive learning platform.
-- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
-- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
-- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
-- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
-- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
-- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review

Image
Join the discussion

by shekhar.kataria » Tue Mar 06, 2012 5:58 am
Hi Jim

Can you quote atlest one OG question where the sentence has two noun referents and where logically only one stands as far as the meaning is concerned but still the answer is incorrect.

That would really be helpful. Thanks in advance.



Jim@StratusPrep wrote:You are right with your statement that 1 pronoun must relate to 1 noun. Even despite logical reasoning, workers and cars in the same sentence cannot have a 'they.' Even though cars do not make money, in theory it creates confusion. What if the cars were appreciating in value? The other examples where you switching to a singular car, you can use they because it refers to the workers.

Hope this helps.
Restlessness and discontent are the first necessities of progress.--Thomas A. Edison

If you find this post helpful, let me know by clicking thanks above :-)
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1