Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 1 and Nov 21. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Basic doubt on the usage of with

Expert replies
by [email protected] » Fri Nov 11, 2016 8:04 am
Hi Experts,

Can you please help me to understand If and When can 'With' be used to replace 'Because' and if that brings any change in meaning?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by lauramatthew » Mon Nov 14, 2016 4:23 am
It is very hard to find reply for your answer. Because is giving credits to someone / something. With is giving who/ what was with you when you done something.
However, in some situation, for example
I have done with him( he was there with me, when i done something)
I have done because of him( He only made me to do it)
Thus, obviously meaning changes
https://canadaessaywriting.com/
Join the discussion

by MartyMurray » Mon Nov 14, 2016 4:49 am
[email protected] wrote:Hi Experts,

Can you please help me to understand If and When can 'With' be used to replace 'Because' and if that brings any change in meaning?
Do you mean "since" rather than "with"? I don't see how "with" could replace "because".

Maybe you could provide some kind of example or scenario to illustrate what you are talking about.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Mon Nov 14, 2016 10:32 am
Hi Marty,

What I meant was I remember seeing a question where the opening modifier began a dep clause with 'because' and then another option had the opening modifier beginning with 'with'.

I can't find the question now but I will look for it and share with you. Now what I want to understand is:
1. Can 'with' replace 'because' without bringing a change in the meaning? Can you show me with some examples.
2. If yes, in what scenarios are they interchangeable
Join the discussion

by MartyMurray » Mon Nov 14, 2016 9:56 pm
Ok. So while an example would be helpful, I can say without seeing one that a sentence beginning with with will have a meaning different from that of one beginning with because.

Either version could be correct though.

Here are two correct examples. Their meanings are in a way similar while definitely different.

With growth in the number of factories came increased pollution.

Because the number of factories grew, pollution increased.

The second more clearly conveys that there is a cause and effect relationship between growth in the number of factories and increased pollution.

Meanwhile, here is something to keep in mind.

There is a myth that an answer choice the use of which creates a sentence that conveys a meaning different from that of the original sentence is the wrong answer.

The truth is that meaning is a criterion for choosing between answer choices only in that one chooses between choices by considering the degrees to which their conveyed meanings make sense.

So if using an answer choice beginning with with is the way to create the version that is most effective and makes the most sense, that answer choice is the best answer.

If using a choice beginning with because works best, then that choice is the right answer.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Join the discussion

by gocoder » Fri Nov 18, 2016 10:04 am
With 20 percent of the world's fresh water, that is more than all the North American Great Lakes combined, Siberia's Lake Baikal has more than 300 rivers that drain into it.

This is a wrong option from a GMAT prep question.
if this choice is rephrased like this:
With 20 percent of the world's fresh water, more than all the North American Great Lakes combined, Siberia's Lake Baikal has more than 300 rivers that drain into it.
Join the discussion