BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Bad Harvesting

Expert replies
by B166418 » Wed Oct 31, 2012 1:13 am
Because of a rare type of fungus that killed off many cacao trees in Brazil, there was an unusually meager harvest of cacao beans this year. The wholesale price of cocoa solids and cocoa butter has increased significantly and is unlikely to fall in the foreseeable future. As a result, the retail price of chocolate is certain to increase within six months.

The answer to which of the following questions would provide information relevant to evaluating the argument above?

(A) Has the price of cocoa solids and cocoa butter remained steady during other periods of poor )
harvest?

(B) Are consumers willing to spend more for chocolate?

(C) Have the prices of other ingredients in chocolate decreased recently?

(D) What percentage of cacao trees in Brazil were affected by the fungus?

(E) Can the fungus be eliminated within the next six months?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by anuprajan5 » Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:50 am
the answer is C because this is relevant to whether the retail price of chocolate will rise.
Regards
Anup

The only lines that matter - are the ones you make!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kk4sZcG ... ata_player
Join the discussion

by bubbliiiiiiii » Thu Nov 01, 2012 3:35 am
IMO C
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by zeza » Thu Nov 01, 2012 2:14 pm
IMO C - as retail chocolate price depends on price of other ingredients
Join the discussion

by mailmado » Thu Nov 01, 2012 5:04 pm
How about ans E
Answer C says recently decrease....
Where as E says for next six months.....
And the conclusion is for next six months....
Join the discussion

by umeshpatil » Thu Nov 01, 2012 5:21 pm
Can anyone could explain why (C) is correct? I also feel, E is more correct.

Conclusion of premise is "price of chocolate is certain to increase within six months". If farmers are able to eliminate the fungus, then there won't be any shortfall of cacao beans. So, chances of price rise will be decreased."

Prices of other ingredients is not discussed anywhere in the argument. Amount of price decrease as compared with price rise in cacao is not presented by ans(C). So, this cannot determine the overall cost of chocolate. If cacao is not available chocolate can not be made.
Join the discussion

by anuprajan5 » Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:26 pm
umeshpatil wrote:Can anyone could explain why (C) is correct? I also feel, E is more correct.

Conclusion of premise is "price of chocolate is certain to increase within six months". If farmers are able to eliminate the fungus, then there won't be any shortfall of cacao beans. So, chances of price rise will be decreased."

Prices of other ingredients is not discussed anywhere in the argument. Amount of price decrease as compared with price rise in cacao is not presented by ans(C). So, this cannot determine the overall cost of chocolate. If cacao is not available chocolate can not be made.

Hi,

there was an unusually meager harvest of cacao beans this year.
The wholesale price of cocoa solids and cocoa butter has increased significantly and is unlikely to fall in the foreseeable future

Conclusion: price of chocolate is certain to increase within six months

The premises and conclusion is marked above. Since the price of 1 component of chocolate is unlikely to fall, we might need to look at options that talk about other components of chocolate. If other component prices were to fall, then the conclusion would fail.

As to E, if the fungus was eliminated within the next 6 months, the harvest of cacao beans has already been unusually meager. So due to the shortfall, there is definitely going to be a rise in the price of chocolates.

Regards
Anup
Regards
Anup

The only lines that matter - are the ones you make!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kk4sZcG ... ata_player
Join the discussion