BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Bacteria!!!!

Expert replies
by logitech » Wed Nov 26, 2008 8:50 pm
A scientist is studying bacteria whose cell population doubles at constant intervals, at which times each cell in the population divides simultaneously. Four hours from now, immediately after the population doubles, the scientist will destroy the entire sample. How many cells will the population contain when the bacteria is destroyed?

(1) Since the population divided two hours ago, the population has quadrupled, increasing by 3,750 cells.

(2) The population will double to 40,000 cells with one hour remaining until the scientist destroys the sample.

OA C and I am interested in to know the # cells at the end of 4 hrs.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by rohangupta83 » Thu Nov 27, 2008 3:37 am
i am not sure whether you really need the second statement.

here is my solution

statement I
2 hours ago let the population of bacteria = x
now the population = 4x (quadrupled)
or
now the population is x+3750 (population increased by 3750 in 4 hrs)

4x = x + 3750
3x = 3750
x=1250

also, population became 4 times in 2 hours

therefore, the population became double in 1 hr and then doubled again in the next hour - hence, quadrupled in 2 hours

2 hrs ago - 1250
1 hr ago - 2500
now - 5000
1 hr from now - 10,000
2 hrs from now - 20,000
3 hrs from now - 40,000
4 hrs from now - 80,000

statement I is sufficient.

statement II

now population = x
3 hours from now population = 40,000

we have no way to find the rate so Statement II is insufficient.

imo A
Join the discussion

by logitech » Thu Nov 27, 2008 10:32 am
rohangupta83 wrote:i am not sure whether you really need the second statement.

here is my solution

statement I
2 hours ago let the population of bacteria = x
now the population = 4x (quadrupled)
or
now the population is x+3750 (population increased by 3750 in 4 hrs)

4x = x + 3750
3x = 3750
x=1250

also, population became 4 times in 2 hours

therefore, the population became double in 1 hr and then doubled again in the next hour - hence, quadrupled in 2 hours

2 hrs ago - 1250
1 hr ago - 2500
now - 5000
1 hr from now - 10,000
2 hrs from now - 20,000
3 hrs from now - 40,000
4 hrs from now - 80,000

statement I is sufficient.

statement II

now population = x
3 hours from now population = 40,000

we have no way to find the rate so Statement II is insufficient.

imo A
"If the population quadrupled during the last two hours, it doubled twice during that interval, but this does not necessarily mean that the population doubled at 60 minute intervals. It may have, for example, doubled at 50 or 55 minute intervals. We cannot determine from statement (1) how frequently the population is doubling." :twisted:
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by rohangupta83 » Thu Nov 27, 2008 2:38 pm
logitech wrote:
"If the population quadrupled during the last two hours, it doubled twice during that interval, but this does not necessarily mean that the population doubled at 60 minute intervals. It may have, for example, doubled at 50 or 55 minute intervals. We cannot determine from statement (1) how frequently the population is doubling." :twisted:
damn! i fell into the trap!
Join the discussion

by cramya » Thu Nov 27, 2008 3:42 pm
Rohan dont sweat too much. IMO this is a 900+ question(since it required verbal and qiuant skills) :-)

Nice problem I agree but I would guess and move on. It better be an experimental one :evil:
Join the discussion

by iamcste » Thu Nov 27, 2008 4:14 pm
can feel bacteria around...


In such cases, I either choose C or E

so, I still have a 50-50 chance :)
Join the discussion

by logitech » Thu Nov 27, 2008 4:28 pm
iamcste wrote:can feel bacteria around...


In such cases, I either choose C or E

so, I still have a 50-50 chance :)
I think the choice is between A and C ;-)

Oh well, if you see a problem like this in your test. Smile and remember me! ;-)
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion