BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

back pain

Expert replies
by jeevan.Gk » Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:24 am
The Ergonomic Society conducted a study that indicated that many people develop severe back problems during adulthood, and that virtually all such people who received chiropractic treatment showed great improvement. Therefore, in order to minimize the proportion of the population that suffers from back pain, the Ergonomic Society recommended that chiropractic treatment be directed toward those adults who suffer from severe back problems.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
a. Any person who receives chiropractic treatment for back pain may also benefit from other forms of treatment.
b. Large insurance carriers cover chiropractic care for back problems to a lesser degree than they do other medical treatments.
c. Individuals who receive chiropractic or other treatment prior to developing severe back problems are not less likely to develop back pain than those who do not.
d. Chiropractic treatment is more effective in treating severe back problems when utilized over a long period of time, as opposed to sporadically.
e. Severe back pain and other problems often cause individuals to miss workdays.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by delhiboy1979 » Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:52 am
I would go with C using PoE. The Society recommends directing treatment towards people already sufferring from back pain, so they are assuming that people will anyway have back pains in adulthood, why else would they not target all adults.
Join the discussion

by matterover » Tue Mar 03, 2009 1:30 am
Assumption Questions :
All assumption questions are also a sub category for weaken questions, only difference is whatever weakens is negated.(thus forming an assumption).

Also pay close attention to scope-qualifiers: adulthood, directed toward.


Argument :
People suffer from backpain.
Treatment given to those has resulted in significant improvement.

Hence :
to minimize the proportion of ppl suffering from backpain, treatment be directed only toward those individuals suffering from severe back pains.

If we were to weaken this statement, i would logically ask,
why not give treatment to everybody to prevent the back pain, rather than as a cure after it has occured.

Option C. precisely tells that the treatment to a person without backpain will not guarantee that the pain will not develop and hence is the right assumption.

My $0.01
Join the discussion

by bmlaud » Tue Mar 03, 2009 7:56 am
IMO C

Negate the assumption ie: Individuals who receive chiropractic or other treatment prior to developing severe back problems are less likely to develop back pain than those who do not.

If true, the conclusion - in order to minimize the proportion of the population that suffers from back pain, the Ergonomic Society recommended that chiropractic treatment be directed toward those adults who suffer from severe back problems - gets weakened.
"Great works are performed not by strength but by perseverance."
Join the discussion

by satish.nagdev » Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:06 pm
I feel C is wrong, aren't we supposed to consider only chiropractic treatment as opposed to other treatments in (C)

I feel D to be correct. anyone explain please and whats OA
Join the discussion

by earth@work » Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:42 pm
satish, D is out of scope, nowhere in the argument is the time period mentioned, similar to B which talks about insurance and E talks about "miss workdays" These are all out of scope so we are left with A & C
A. weakens the argument.
so, the choice is C, negation stratergy confirms this choice
Join the discussion

by quocbao » Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:44 pm
satish.nagdev wrote:I feel C is wrong, aren't we supposed to consider only chiropractic treatment as opposed to other treatments in (C)

I feel D to be correct. anyone explain please and whats OA
I think the answer is C. D has one extra clue about time so I think it will not related.

My 2 cents :-D
Join the discussion

by jeevan.Gk » Sun Mar 08, 2009 6:32 am
Oa is C.. Sorry for the delay
Join the discussion

by mason77 » Sat May 14, 2016 1:19 am
One more for C
Join the discussion