BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

AWA Response - Please Rate

Critical Reasoning, Reading Comprehension
Expert replies

Rate

1
0
No votes
2
0
No votes
3
0
No votes
4
0
No votes
5
0
No votes
6
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 0

by Surbhi28 » Mon Sep 25, 2017 11:24 pm
The following appeared as a part of an article in the business section of a local newspaper:

"The Cumquat Cafe made a mistake in moving to a new location. After one year at the new spot, it is doing about the same volume of business as before, but the owners of RoboWrench plumbing supply wholesale outlet that took over its old location are apparently doing better: RoboWrench is planning to open a store in a neighboring city."

Discuss how well reasoned.... etc.

Response:

In the above argument, the author concludes that The Cumquat Cafe made a mistake in moving to a new location. The line of reasoning is primarily based on comparison of Cumquat Cafe with RoboWernch plumbing supply wholesale outlet. However, the argument is vague and fails to consider several important points.

The author has conveniently compared Apples with Oranges and has come to the conclusion that moving to a new location was a huge mistake for Cumquat Cafe. Cumquat cafe is a cafeteria or say a food place whereas Robowrench is a Plumbing supply wholesale outlet. There are different factors which determine the success of different kinds of businesses such as the brand name, the type of business, the customer base, the requirement in that particular locality, the season time etc. For instance, Robowrench is only plumbing wholesale outlet in its locality whereas the Cafe has a lot of competition. The Cafe would be doing good business but not in comparison with the supply outlet.

The author assumes that the Cafe doing about the same volume of business as before is an indication that moving was a mistake. When a business is set up in a new locality, it takes time for it to acquire customers. However, if the cafe is doing the same business as it did in it's previous location is a good thing. When comparing the profits, the author should once consider the number of years Cumquat Cafe did business in the previous location and the business it made during the first two initial years. If the Cafe made less profits in the first two years of the previous location then the author assumption stands wrong.

Also, the author of the article has come to a conclusion that the Robowrench plumbing supply wholesale is doing better, just because they are planning to open a store in a neighboring city. Opening a store does not imply any business is doing better. Robowrench's business model could be completely different than Cumquat Cafe. The author should consider checking where exactly the funds for setting the new store is coming from, does Robowrench has other multiple stores etc. Robowrench might have other stores and they are looking to expand.

Overall, the article in the business section misses on points such as; comparison between two different kinds of businesses without considering all the factors is not wise; Secondly, the basis that the Cafe is doing a good business should be compared with it's profits in the first two years of it's business in previous location; Lastly, the assumption that since Robowrench is opening another store that means it is doing well.

The above mentioned points should be considered before coming to a conclusion that Cumquat Cafe made a mistake shifting to a new location.
Join the discussion
Source: — Verbal Reasoning |