BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Averages

Expert replies
by Abdulla » Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:23 pm
If the average size of 3 accounts is $1 million, is the smallest account less than $500,000?

(1) The largest account is $1.3 million.
(2) One of the accounts is $0.7 million.

OA is C

My question is if I changed statement one from 1.3 million to 1.2 million, A is going to be sufficient right?
Abdulla
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: Averages

by palvarez » Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:34 pm
Abdulla wrote:If the average size of 3 accounts is $1 million, is the smallest account less than $500,000?

(1) The largest account is $1.3 million.
(2) One of the accounts is $0.7 million.


My question is if I changed statement one from 1.3 million to 1.2 million, A is going to be sufficient right?
a+b+c = 3 and a <= b<= c, is a < 0.5

Without any info, we can say that a <= 1 (the least can be at most the average).


(1) you say, c = 1.2
a + b = 1.8
a <= average
a <= 0.9M insufficient
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Wed Nov 11, 2009 6:11 pm
IMO C
Join the discussion

Re: Averages

by Abdulla » Wed Nov 11, 2009 6:43 pm
palvarez wrote:
Abdulla wrote:If the average size of 3 accounts is $1 million, is the smallest account less than $500,000?

(1) The largest account is $1.3 million.
(2) One of the accounts is $0.7 million.


My question is if I changed statement one from 1.3 million to 1.2 million, A is going to be sufficient right?
a+b+c = 3 and a <= b<= c, is a < 0.5

Without any info, we can say that a <= 1 (the least can be at most the average).


(1) you say, c = 1.2
a + b = 1.8
a <= average
a <= 0.9M insufficient
It's insufficient, you're right and your logic is very nice and clear, but what if a=.4M then b will be 1.4M which is larger than the largest number 1.3M (c), so we can't say a<=.9M
an if a= .5M
then b= 1.3M and c=1.3M too.
Thus, a<=.5M.... If the question was " is the smallest account less than or equal to $500,000"? then the first statement will be sufficient ..

Am I right ?
Abdulla
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:02 pm
Abdulla,

Each choice is Insufficient, even if A says 1.2 mill, because the other accounts could be anything. try any numbers for each option and you will find that the smallest account could be > or < 500.00.

Try reading the latest article in the articles section, by Stacy; it is related to this. Also, search articles under "statistics" or "averages". Go for the more difficult average problems and concepts, then you won't be confused about this.

I am not sure what you are referring to as a and b in yyour last posting. If you are trying to alter the problem to see how the answer will differ, I suggest going to other average problems directly, because you will have better structured questions.
Join the discussion

Re: Averages

by palvarez » Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:16 pm
Abdulla wrote:
palvarez wrote:
Abdulla wrote:If the average size of 3 accounts is $1 million, is the smallest account less than $500,000?

(1) The largest account is $1.3 million.
(2) One of the accounts is $0.7 million.


My question is if I changed statement one from 1.3 million to 1.2 million, A is going to be sufficient right?
a+b+c = 3 and a <= b<= c, is a < 0.5

Without any info, we can say that a <= 1 (the least can be at most the average).


(1) you say, c = 1.2
a + b = 1.8
a <= average
a <= 0.9M insufficient
It's insufficient, you're right and your logic is very nice and clear, but what if a=.4M then b will be 1.4M which is larger than the largest number 1.3M (c), so we can't say a<=.9M
an if a= .5M
then b= 1.3M and c=1.3M too.
Thus, a<=.5M.... If the question was " is the smallest account less than or equal to $500,000"? then the first statement will be sufficient ..

Am I right ?
You made me thinking.

Let me refocus on the question.

a + b = 1.8 and c = 1.2
a <= 0.9 (max)
a = 1.8 -1.2 = 0.6 thats min, since we know b's max.
0.6 <= a <= 0.8

Sufficient.
Join the discussion

by Abdulla » Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:47 pm
heshamelaziry wrote:Abdulla,

Each choice is Insufficient, even if A says 1.2 mill, because the other accounts could be anything. try any numbers for each option and you will find that the smallest account could be > or < 500.00.

Try reading the latest article in the articles section, by Stacy; it is related to this. Also, search articles under "statistics" or "averages". Go for the more difficult average problems and concepts, then you won't be confused about this.

I am not sure what you are referring to as a and b in yyour last posting. If you are trying to alter the problem to see how the answer will differ, I suggest going to other average problems directly, because you will have better structured questions.
Thanks Hesham, I will definitely follow your advice, but see palvarez's last post.
btw, I used a,b, and c to follow with the same variables that palvarez assign.
Last edited by Abdulla on Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Abdulla
Join the discussion

Re: Averages

by Abdulla » Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:48 pm
palvarez wrote:
Abdulla wrote:
palvarez wrote:
Abdulla wrote:If the average size of 3 accounts is $1 million, is the smallest account less than $500,000?

(1) The largest account is $1.3 million.
(2) One of the accounts is $0.7 million.


My question is if I changed statement one from 1.3 million to 1.2 million, A is going to be sufficient right?
a+b+c = 3 and a <= b<= c, is a < 0.5

Without any info, we can say that a <= 1 (the least can be at most the average).


(1) you say, c = 1.2
a + b = 1.8
a <= average
a <= 0.9M insufficient
It's insufficient, you're right and your logic is very nice and clear, but what if a=.4M then b will be 1.4M which is larger than the largest number 1.3M (c), so we can't say a<=.9M
an if a= .5M
then b= 1.3M and c=1.3M too.
Thus, a<=.5M.... If the question was " is the smallest account less than or equal to $500,000"? then the first statement will be sufficient ..

Am I right ?
You made me thinking.

Let me refocus on the question.

a + b = 1.8 and c = 1.2
a <= 0.9 (max)
a = 1.8 -1.2 = 0.6 thats min, since we know b's max.
0.6 <= a <= 0.8

Sufficient.
Thanks palvarez, I think you got my point.
Abdulla
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:57 pm
Ok, I am lost. I don't understand where the 1.2 coming from if A) says 1.3. Could you guide me through each option the conventional way
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Wed Nov 11, 2009 9:00 pm
The OA sited is C. Is this still holding ?
Join the discussion

by palvarez » Wed Nov 11, 2009 10:01 pm
heshamelaziry wrote:Ok, I am lost. I don't understand where the 1.2 coming from if A) says 1.3. Could you guide me through each option the conventional way
Adbulla modified the problem to see whetehr (1) alone is sufficient.
Join the discussion

by Abdulla » Wed Nov 11, 2009 10:16 pm
heshamelaziry wrote:The OA sited is C. Is this still holding ?
Hesham, you're right the OA is C and based on the abovementioned question, C is the answer, but I was trying to find a way to make the first statement sufficient, so I made some changes on the first statement.
I've bolded the changes.

If the average size of 3 accounts is $1 million, is the smallest account less than $500,000?
(1) The largest account is $1.2 million.

now, based on that.. my thought was as follows:

lets assign a, b, and c for the three accounts so,

a + b + c = 3,000,000 and from statement 1 we know that c=1,200,000

so,
a + b = 1,800,000 . Now in order to minimize (a) we should maximize (b) ..

Since (b) should be less or equal to (c) then, we can maximize it only to 1,200,000.

a + 1,200,000 + 1,200,000 = 3,000,000

Therefore, a= 600,000 ---------- which is greater than 500,000.

Hence, A is Sufficient based on the new changes.
Abdulla
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Wed Nov 11, 2009 10:25 pm
Got it Abdulla. Excellent manipulation to test your self on the subject. Some of the problems that test this subject are quite annoying. could check this out:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/min-max-t48068.html
Join the discussion