BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Average per capita income

Expert replies
by crackgmat007 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:19 pm
Demographers doing research for an international economics newsletter claim that the average per capita income in the country of Kuptala is substantially lower than that in the country of Bahlton. They also claim, however, that whereas poverty is relatively rare in Kuptala, over half the population of Bahlton lives in extreme poverty. At least one of the demographers’ claims must, therefore, be wrong.
The argument above is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?
(A) It rejects an empirical claim about the average per capita incomes in the two countries without making any attempt to discredit that claim by offering additional economic evidence.
(B) It treats the vague term “poverty” as though it had a precise and universally accepted meaning.
(C) It overlooks the possibility that the number of people in the two countries who live in poverty could be the same even though the percentages of the two populations that live in poverty differ markedly.
(D) It fails to show that wealth and poverty have the same social significance in Kuptala as in Bahlton.
(E) It does not consider the possibility that incomes in Kuptala, unlike those in Bahlton, might all be very close to the country’s average per capita income.

OA- E pls explain
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Re: Average per capita income

by ankit1383 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:05 pm
Average income of kuptala=100
Population=2
and two peope have 100 as incme
income close to the average
that incomes in Kuptala, unlike those in Bahlton, might all be very close to the country’s average per capita income.

Average income of Bahlton=150
Population=2
one has income as 290 and other has income as only 10

so one persn live below povrty line in bahlton(assuming income of 10 is below poverty line)
Join the discussion

Didn't really understand the explaination

by viju9162 » Sun Jun 07, 2009 2:35 am
The conclusion is two of the above mentioned theories must be wrong. How E is subjecting it to crticism?
Join the discussion

Re: Didn't really understand the explaination

by btg760 » Sun Jun 07, 2009 4:11 am
viju9162 wrote:The conclusion is two of the above mentioned theories must be wrong. How E is subjecting it to crticism?
(E) is subjecting to criticism to the conclusion by stating that mentioned two theories are correct. Hence, conclusion drawn is not valid.
Join the discussion

Re: Average per capita income

by vinaynp » Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:20 am
crackgmat007 wrote:Demographers doing research for an international economics newsletter claim that the average per capita income in the country of Kuptala is substantially lower than that in the country of Bahlton. They also claim, however, that whereas poverty is relatively rare in Kuptala, over half the population of Bahlton lives in extreme poverty. At least one of the demographers’ claims must, therefore, be wrong.
The argument above is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?
(A) It rejects an empirical claim about the average per capita incomes in the two countries without making any attempt to discredit that claim by offering additional economic evidence.
(B) It treats the vague term “poverty” as though it had a precise and universally accepted meaning.
(C) It overlooks the possibility that the number of people in the two countries who live in poverty could be the same even though the percentages of the two populations that live in poverty differ markedly.
(D) It fails to show that wealth and poverty have the same social significance in Kuptala as in Bahlton.
(E) It does not consider the possibility that incomes in Kuptala, unlike those in Bahlton, might all be very close to the country’s average per capita income.

OA- E pls explain
From statements give, we can conclude the below information:
a) Country B Per Capita > Country K Per Capita
b) 50% of Country B is in poverty.
c) There is virtually no poverty in Country K.

b) is only possible when there is a big divide in wealth of rich and poor in Country B.
c) is only possible when most of the people earn the same.

E) answers that correctly.
Join the discussion

by mason77 » Sun May 15, 2016 2:53 pm
I would go with option E as the correct option
Join the discussion